Sensitivity analysis of dry machining using a Life Cycle Assessment approach

被引:0
作者
Jeulin, Mael [1 ]
Laratte, Bertrand [2 ]
Laheurte, Raynald [1 ]
Darnis, Philippe [1 ]
Cahuc, Olivier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, UMR 5295, I2M, 351 Cours Liberat, F-33400 Talence, France
[2] Arts & Metiers, UMR 5295, I2M, 8 Ave Univ, F-33400 Talence, France
关键词
Machining; Life Cycle Assessment; Consumption; Uncertainty analysis; Sensitivity analysis; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.02.063
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Manufacturing processes, particularly machining operations, contribute significantly to the environmental footprint of the industrial sector, primarily driven by the consumption of critical resources such as lubricants, tools, and electrical energy. However, the large number of machining parameters and the difficulties modeling industrial products have always limited analysis of the environmental impact of the process. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the environmental impact during dry machining. overarching goal is to contribute to the development of strategies to mitigate the environmental consequences of these manufacturing processes. To achieve this objective, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted quantify and analyze the environmental impact, using the Environmental Footprint 3.0 calculation method. The central idea is to highlight the often -underestimated contribution of tool wear to the overall environmental impact of the machining process, whereas in the literature electrical energy is the most studied source of consumption. The methodology involves an analytical model, and an experimental test designed quantify the resource consumption, with the conduct of a sensitivity analysis to determine the machining parameters and scenario influence on the distribution of environmental impact. While electricity consumption traditionally dominates discussions of environmental impact in machining, results of the study reveal significant contribution from tool wear in the environmental impact ratio, according to specific environmental indicators. The preponderance of this contribution is favored when the values of cutting conditions or radius /number of teeth are increased. Depending on the values of the cutting conditions, the scenario and environmental indicator, the proportion of tool wear in the environmental impact ratio can vary from 5% almost 90%. In terms of global environmental impact, cutting speed is the most influential parameter, varying by more than 2 times the minimum value for each environmental indicator. A precise definition of the scenario and consideration of the machining parameters are therefore essential to assess the environmental impact machining correctly. This study also underscores the importance of considering tool wear in the environmental impact of dry machining, which plays an important role depending on cutting conditions, especially cutting speed.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 212
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]  
Liu X., 2006, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of a simplified ORWARE model for Jakarta
[32]   Life cycle assessment of tungsten carbide powder production: A case study in China [J].
Ma, Xiaotian ;
Qi, Congcong ;
Ye, Liping ;
Yang, Donglu ;
Hong, Jinglan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 :936-944
[33]   AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH FOR DETERMINING THE ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT OF MACHINING PROCESSES [J].
MUNOZ, AA ;
SHENG, P .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 53 (3-4) :736-758
[34]   Environmental burden analysis for machining operation using LCA method [J].
Narita, Hirohisa ;
Desmira, Nelfa ;
Fujimoto, Hideo .
MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE NEW FRONTIER, 2008, :65-68
[35]   Process performance and life cycle assessment of friction drilling on dual-phase steel [J].
Pereira, O. ;
Urbikain, G. ;
Rodriguez, A. ;
Calleja, A. ;
Ayesta, I. ;
Lopez de Lacalle, L. N. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 :1147-1156
[36]   Cryogenic and minimum quantity lubrication for an eco-efficiency turning of AISI 304 [J].
Pereira, O. ;
Rodriguez, A. ;
Fernandez-Abia, A. I. ;
Barreiro, J. ;
Lopez de Lacalle, L. N. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 :440-449
[37]  
PRe Sustainability, 2023, SimaPro
[38]   Transitioning to sustainable production - Part I: application on machining technologies [J].
Pusavec, Frand ;
Krajnik, Peter ;
Kopac, Janez .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (02) :174-184
[39]  
Sandvik Coromant, 2017, Training handbook, metal cutting technology, C-2920:40
[40]   Life cycle assessment of drilling Inconel 718 using cryogenic cutting fluids while considering sustainability parameters [J].
Shah, Prassan ;
Bhat, Prathamesh ;
Khanna, Navneet .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 43