Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Outcomes and Endpoints

被引:1
作者
Bodien, Yelena G. [1 ,2 ]
LaRovere, Kerri [3 ]
Kondziella, Daniel [4 ,5 ]
Taran, Shaurya [6 ]
Estrano, Anna [7 ]
Shutter, Lori [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Neurotechnol & Neurorecovery, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshospitalet, Dept Neurol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi Fdn, Dept Neurorehabil, Florence, Italy
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Crit Care Med, UPMC Healthcare Syst, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[9] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurol, UPMC Healthcare Syst, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[10] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Neurosurg, UPMC Healthcare Syst, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Coma; Consciousness; Common data elements; Outcome; Recovery; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; SENSORY STIMULATION PROFILE; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; SCALE; RECOVERY; COMA; VALIDATION; STATE; CONFUSION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-024-02068-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundClinical management of persons with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is dedicated largely to optimizing recovery. However, selecting a measure to evaluate the extent of recovery is challenging because few measures are designed to precisely assess the full range of potential outcomes, from prolonged DoC to return of preinjury functioning. Measures that are designed specifically to assess persons with DoC are often performance-based and only validated for in-person use. Moreover, there are no published recommendations addressing which outcome measures should be used to evaluate DoC recovery. The resulting inconsistency in the measures selected by individual investigators to assess outcome prevents comparison of results across DoC studies. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) common data elements (CDEs) is an amalgamation of standardized variables and tools that are recommended for use in studies of neurologic diseases and injuries. The Neurocritical Care Society Curing Coma Campaign launched an initiative to develop CDEs specifically for DoC and invited our group to recommend CDE outcomes and endpoints for persons with DoCs.MethodsThe Curing Coma Campaign Outcomes and Endpoints CDE Workgroup, consisting of experts in adult and pediatric neurocritical care, neurology, and neuroscience, used a previously established five-step process to identify and select candidate CDEs: (1) review of existing NINDS CDEs, (2) nomination and systematic vetting of new CDEs, (3) CDE classification, (4) iterative review and approval of panel recommendations, and (5) development of case report forms.ResultsAmong hundreds of existing NINDS outcome and endpoint CDE measures, we identified 20 for adults and 18 for children that can be used to assess the full range of recovery from coma. We also proposed 14 new outcome and endpoint CDE measures for adults and 5 for children.ConclusionsThe DoC outcome and endpoint CDEs are a starting point in the broader effort to standardize outcome evaluation of persons with DoC. The ultimate goal is to harmonize DoC studies and allow for more precise assessment of outcomes after severe brain injury or illness. An iterative approach is required to modify and adjust these outcome and endpoint CDEs as new evidence emerges.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 368
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Core Outcomes and Common Data Elements in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature Focusing on Baseline and Peri-Operative Care Data Elements
    Chari, Aswin
    Hocking, Katie C.
    Edlmann, Ellie
    Turner, Carole
    Santarius, Thomas
    Hutchinson, Peter J.
    Kolias, Angelos G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2016, 33 (17) : 1569 - 1575
  • [32] A common data language for clinical research studies: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine Cerebral Palsy Common Data Elements Version 1.0 recommendations
    Schiariti, Veronica
    Fowler, Eileen
    Brandenburg, Joline E.
    Levey, Eric
    Mcintyre, Sarah
    Sukal-Moulton, Theresa
    Ramey, Sharon L.
    Rose, Jessica
    Sienko, Susan
    Stashinko, Elaine
    Vogtle, Laura
    Feldman, Robin S.
    Koenig, James I.
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2018, 60 (10) : 976 - +
  • [33] Delineating the Nature and Correlates of Social Dysfunction after Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury Using Common Data Elements: Evidence from an International Multi-Cohort Study
    Ryan, Nicholas P.
    Anderson, Vicki A.
    Bigler, Erin D.
    Dennis, Maureen
    Taylor, H. Gerry
    Rubin, Kenneth H.
    Vannatta, Kathryn
    Gerhardt, Cynthia A.
    Stancin, Terry
    Beauchamp, Miriam H.
    Hearps, Stephen
    Catroppa, Cathy
    Yeates, Keith Owen
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2021, 38 (02) : 252 - 260
  • [34] Patient Outcomes in Disorders of Consciousness Following Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data
    O'Neal, Christen M.
    Schroeder, Lindsey N.
    Wells, Allison A.
    Chen, Sixia
    Stephens, Tressie M.
    Glenn, Chad A.
    Conner, Andrew K.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [35] Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: does PCA3 testing for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer improve patient health outcomes?
    Calonge, Ned
    Klein, Roger D.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Campos-Outcalt, Doug
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Ganiats, Theodore
    Janssens, A. Cetile J. W.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Pauker, Stephen G.
    Piper, Margaret
    Richards, Carolyn Sue
    Strickland, Ora L.
    Tunis, Sean
    Williams, Marc S.
    Zallen, Doris
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (04) : 338 - 346
  • [36] Common Data Elements for Radiological Imaging of Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group
    Katharina A. M. Hackenberg
    Nima Etminan
    Max Wintermark
    Philip M. Meyers
    Giuseppe Lanzino
    Daniel Rüfenacht
    Timo Krings
    John Huston
    Gabriel Rinkel
    Colin Derdeyn
    Neurocritical Care, 2019, 30 : 60 - 78
  • [37] The international anorectal physiology working group (IAPWG) recommendations: Standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function
    Carrington, Emma V.
    Heinrich, Henriette
    Knowles, Charles H.
    Fox, Mark
    Rao, Satish
    Altomare, Donato F.
    Bharucha, Adil E.
    Burgell, Rebecca
    Chey, William D.
    Chiarioni, Guiseppe
    Dinning, Philip
    Emmanuel, Anton
    Farouk, Ridzuan
    Felt-Bersma, Richelle J. F.
    Jung, Kee Wook
    Lembo, Anthony
    Malcolm, Allison
    Mittal, Ravinder K.
    Mion, Francois
    Myung, Seung-Jae
    O'Connell, P. Ronan
    Pehl, Christian
    Remes Troche, Jose Maria
    Reveille, R. Matthew
    Vaizey, Carolynne J.
    Vitton, Veronique
    Whitehead, William E.
    Wong, Reuben K.
    Scott, S. Mark
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [38] Common Data Elements for Radiological Imaging of Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group
    Hackenberg, Katharina A. M.
    Etminan, Nima
    Wintermark, Max
    Meyers, Philip M.
    Lanzino, Giuseppe
    Rufenacht, Daniel
    Krings, Timo
    Huston, John, III
    Rinkel, Gabriel
    Derdeyn, Colin
    Suarez, Jose I.
    Macdonald, R. Loch
    Amin-Hanjani, Sepideh
    Brown, Robert D., Jr.
    Manoel, Airton Leonardo de Oliveira
    Derdeyn, Colin P.
    Etminan, Nima
    Keller, Emanuela
    LeRoux, Peter D.
    Health, Main Line
    Mayer, Stephan
    Morita, Akio
    Rinkel, Gabriel
    Rufennacht, Daniel
    Stienen, Martin N.
    Torner, James
    Vergouwen, Mervyn D. I.
    Wong, George K. C.
    Bijlenga, Philippe
    Ko, Nerissa
    McDougall, Cameron G.
    Mocco, J.
    Murayama, Yuuichi
    Werner, Marieke J. H.
    Mayer, Stephan
    Suarez, Jose I.
    Damani, Rahul
    Broderick, Joseph
    Dhar, Raj
    Jauch, Edward C.
    Kirkpatrick, Peter J.
    Martin, Renee H.
    Mocco, J.
    Muehlschlegel, Susanne
    Mutoh, Tatsushi
    Nyquist, Paul
    Olson, Daiwai
    Mejia-Mantilla, Jorge H.
    Amin-Hanjani, Sepideh
    Manoel, Airton Leonardo de Oliveira
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2019, 30 (Suppl 1) : 60 - 78
  • [39] Swallowing dysfunctions in patients with disorders of consciousness: Evidence from neuroimaging data, assessment, and management
    Regnier, Amandine
    Melotte, Evelyne
    Aubinet, Charlene
    Alnagger, Naji
    Fischer, David
    Lagier, Aude
    Thibaut, Aurore
    Laureys, Steven
    Kaux, Jean-Francois
    Gosseries, Olivia
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2024, 54 (01) : 91 - 107
  • [40] Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can tumor gene expression in patients with breast cancer?
    Berg, Alfred O.
    Grp, E. G. A. P. P. Working
    Armstrong, Katrina
    Botkin, Jeffrey
    Calonge, Ned
    Haddow, James
    Hayes, Maxine
    Kaye, Celia
    Phillips, Kathryn A.
    Piper, Margaret
    Richards, Carolyn Sue
    Scott, Joan A.
    Strickland, Ora L.
    Teutsch, Steven
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (01) : 66 - 73