Enhancing the economic viability and reliability of renewables based electricity supply through Power-to-Gas-to-Power with green hydrogen

被引:11
作者
Park, Joungho [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Sungho [2 ]
Kim, Sunwoo [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Hana [2 ]
Cho, Hyun-Seok [4 ]
Lee, Jay H. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 291 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
[2] Korea Inst Energy Res, Energy AI & Comp Sci Lab, 152 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 34129, South Korea
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Mork Family Dept Chem Engn & Mat Sci, 925 Bloom Walk, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[4] Sogang Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Seoul 04107, South Korea
[5] Univ Southern 21 Calif, Mork Family Dept Chem Engn & Mat Sci, 925 Bloom Walk, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
Green hydrogen; Electrolysis; Fuel cell; Energy storage; Power-to-gas-to-power; ENERGY-STORAGE; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118485
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study explores the role of green hydrogen in the Power-to-Gas-to-Power process as a solution to grid instability caused by the rise of volatile renewable energy sources. A comprehensive numerical model is developed to evaluate the economic viability and reliability of electricity supply, using key performance indicators such as system levelized cost of electricity and loss of power supply probability. Through simulations based on hourly renewable energy production profiles for a scenario with an average power demand of 100 MW, the effectiveness of batteries and green hydrogen is compared. Findings indicate that while batteries are suited to photovoltaic systems, green hydrogen excels in wind energy applications, particularly in wind-solar hybrid setups. Here, green hydrogen substantially enhances the power supply reliability (loss of probability reduced from 0.23 to 0.06) and achieves a competitive system levelized cost of electricity at 0.157 USD/kWh. Sensitivity analysis regarding system size and cost variations further highlights green hydrogen's potential, providing strategic insights for improving grid stability and economic efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources
    Acar, Canan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
  • [3] Argyrou MC, 2018, IEEE INT ENER CONF
  • [4] Multi-objective operation of interconnected multi-energy systems considering power to gas and gas to power systems
    Barati, Amin
    Karimi, Hamid
    Jadid, Shahram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2024, 158
  • [5] Bauer C, 2021, Tech Rep
  • [6] A comparative techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of Power-to-X processes from different energy sources
    Bellotti, D.
    Rivarolo, M.
    Magistri, L.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 260
  • [7] Photovoltaic/battery system sizing for rural electrification in Bolivia: Considering the suppressed demand effect
    Benavente, Fabian
    Lundblad, Anders
    Campana, Pietro Elia
    Zhang, Yang
    Cabrera, Saul
    Lindbergh, Goran
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 235 : 519 - 528
  • [8] Techno-economic feasibility analysis of hydrogen production by PtG concept and feeding it into a combined cycle power plant leading to sector coupling in future
    Bukhari, Muhammad Haroon
    Javed, Adeel
    Kazmi, Syed Ali Abbas
    Ali, Majid
    Chaudhary, Mateeb Talib
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 282
  • [9] Evaluation of strategic directions for supply and demand of green hydrogen in South Korea
    Chu, Kyoung Hoon
    Lim, Jihun
    Mang, Ji Sung
    Hwang, Moon-Hyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (03) : 1409 - 1424
  • [10] Modelling and optimization of a flexible hydrogen-fueled pressurized PEMFC power plant for grid balancing purposes
    Crespi, Elena
    Guandalini, Giulio
    Goessling, Soenke
    Campanari, Stefano
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (24) : 13190 - 13205