Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Tsili, Athina C. [1 ]
Alexiou, George [2 ]
Tzoumpa, Martha [1 ]
Siempis, Timoleon [3 ]
Argyropoulou, Maria I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Univ Campus, Ioannina 45110, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Univ Campus, Ioannina 45110, Greece
[3] Ulster Hosp, ENT Dept, Upper Newtownards Rd, Belfast BT16 1RH, North Ireland
关键词
peritoneal carcinomatosis; ovarian cancer; computed tomography; multidetector; magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion weighted MRI; PET/CT scan; PET/CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; PRIMARY EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; MULTIDETECTOR CT; INDEX PCI; CONVENTIONAL MRI;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16081467
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
    Bollineni, Vikram Rao
    Ytre-Hauge, Sigmund
    Bollineni-Balabay, Oksana
    Salvesen, Helga Birgitte
    Haldorsen, Ingfrid Salvesen
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (06) : 879 - 885
  • [42] Diagnostic Imaging of Colorectal Liver Metastases with CT, MR Imaging, FDG PET, and/or FDG PET/CT: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies Including Patients Who Have Not Previously Undergone Treatment
    Niekel, Maarten Christian
    Bipat, Shandra
    Stoker, Jaap
    RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (03) : 674 - 684
  • [43] [18F]-FDG PET in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali
    Mesci, Aruz
    Murad, Vanessa
    Kohan, Andres
    Ortega, Claudia
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    Metser, Ur
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 51 (01) : 258 - 277
  • [44] MRI combined with PET-CT of different tracers to improve the accuracy of glioma diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yihan
    He, Mike Z.
    Li, Tao
    Yang, Xuejun
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (02) : 185 - 195
  • [45] Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and MRI in the initial diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
    Luo, Xiulan
    Li, Xiaolu
    Chen, Chaolin
    Zheng, Hong
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 50 (03) : 1403 - 1413
  • [46] Imaging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: CT, MRI, Radiomic Features and Resectability Criteria
    Miceli, Valentina
    Gennarini, Marco
    Tomao, Federica
    Cupertino, Angelica
    Lombardo, Dario
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Curti, Federica
    Riccardi, Sandrine
    Ninkova, Roberta
    Maccioni, Francesca
    Ricci, Paolo
    Catalano, Carlo
    Rizzo, Stefania Maria Rita
    Manganaro, Lucia
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [47] A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer
    Liu, Tao
    Cheng, Tao
    Xu, Wen
    Yan, Wei-Li
    Liu, Jia
    Yang, Hui-Lin
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (05) : 523 - 531
  • [48] Peritoneal carcinosis in ovarian cancer: conventional imaging (CT-scan and MRI)
    Bailly, C.
    Bailly-Glatre, A.
    Alfidja, A.
    Vincent, C.
    Dauplat, J.
    Pomel, C.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2009, 96 (12) : 1155 - 1162
  • [49] Comparative Performance of Whole-Body MRI and FDG PET/CT in Evaluation of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Response: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rama, Sharath
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Durieux, Jared C.
    Ramaiya, Nikhil H.
    Tirumani, Sree Harsha
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 602 - 613
  • [50] 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Machado Medeiros, Tassia
    Altmayer, Stephan
    Watte, Guilherme
    Zanon, Matheus
    Basso Dias, Adriano
    Henz Concatto, Natalia
    Hoefel Paes, Julia
    Mattiello, Rita
    de Souza Santos, Francisco
    Mohammed, Tan-Lucien
    Verma, Nupur
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 3641 - 3649