Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Tsili, Athina C. [1 ]
Alexiou, George [2 ]
Tzoumpa, Martha [1 ]
Siempis, Timoleon [3 ]
Argyropoulou, Maria I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Univ Campus, Ioannina 45110, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Univ Campus, Ioannina 45110, Greece
[3] Ulster Hosp, ENT Dept, Upper Newtownards Rd, Belfast BT16 1RH, North Ireland
关键词
peritoneal carcinomatosis; ovarian cancer; computed tomography; multidetector; magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion weighted MRI; PET/CT scan; PET/CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; PRIMARY EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; MULTIDETECTOR CT; INDEX PCI; CONVENTIONAL MRI;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16081467
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diffusion-weighted MRI versus FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing pancreatic cancer: an indirect comparison meta-analysis
    Que, Renye
    Chen, Yirong
    Tao, Zhihui
    Ge, Bingjing
    Li, Miaohua
    Fu, Zhiquan
    Li, Yong
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (11) : 1473 - 1483
  • [22] PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laura Evangelista
    Fabio Zattoni
    Gianluca Cassarino
    Paolo Artioli
    Diego Cecchin
    Fabrizio dal Moro
    Pietro Zucchetta
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 : 859 - 873
  • [23] PET imaging in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mahmud, Aamer
    Poon, Raymond
    Jonker, Derek
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 (1080)
  • [24] Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT
    Michielsen, Katrijn
    Vergote, Ignace
    de Beeck, Katya Op
    Amant, Frederic
    Leunen, Karin
    Moerman, Philippe
    Deroose, Christophe
    Souverijns, Geert
    Dymarkowski, Steven
    De Keyzer, Frederik
    Vandecaveye, Vincent
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) : 889 - 901
  • [25] Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing 18FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy
    Yang, Hui-Lin
    Liu, Tao
    Wang, Xi-Ming
    Xu, Yong
    Deng, Sheng-Ming
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (12) : 2604 - 2617
  • [26] 18F-FDG PET/CT for Surveillance in Salivary Gland Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ajit-Roger, Emily
    Richardson, Keith
    Mlynarek, Alex Marcin
    Sadeghi, Nader
    Hier, Michael P.
    Mascarella, Marco A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2025,
  • [27] Peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer: the role of CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT
    Funicelli, L.
    Travaini, L. L.
    Landoni, F.
    Trifiro, G.
    Bonello, L.
    Bellomi, M.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2010, 35 (06): : 701 - 707
  • [28] Detection of residual tumor following radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases using 18 F-FDG PET/PET-CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Jia-He
    Chang, Zhi-Hui
    Han, Cheng-Bo
    Ma, Jie-Tao
    Liu, Zhao-Yu
    Lu, Zai-Ming
    Guo, Qi-Yong
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 35 (04) : 339 - 346
  • [29] FDG PET/CT diagnostic and prognostic value before hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis
    Zwarthoed, C.
    Bereder, J. -M.
    Viau, P.
    Grangeon, C.
    Maurel, F.
    Darcourt, J.
    Mounier, N.
    Razzouk-Cadet, M.
    MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE, 2014, 38 (06): : 398 - 407
  • [30] Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Cici
    Liang, Zhishan
    Liu, Wei
    Zeng, Xuwen
    Mo, Yuzhen
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)