Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Tsili, Athina C. [1 ]
Alexiou, George [2 ]
Tzoumpa, Martha [1 ]
Siempis, Timoleon [3 ]
Argyropoulou, Maria I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, Univ Campus, Ioannina 45110, Greece
[2] Univ Ioannina, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Univ Campus, Ioannina 45110, Greece
[3] Ulster Hosp, ENT Dept, Upper Newtownards Rd, Belfast BT16 1RH, North Ireland
关键词
peritoneal carcinomatosis; ovarian cancer; computed tomography; multidetector; magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion weighted MRI; PET/CT scan; PET/CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; PRIMARY EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; MULTIDETECTOR CT; INDEX PCI; CONVENTIONAL MRI;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16081467
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imaging of colorectal cancer liver metastases using contrast-enhanced US, multidetector CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: a meta-analysis
    Tsili, Athina C.
    Alexiou, George
    Naka, Christina
    Argyropoulou, Maria, I
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (03) : 302 - 312
  • [2] Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Primary Ovarian Cancer Staging Comparison Between MDCT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Schmidt, Sabine
    Meuli, Reto Antoine
    Achtari, Chahin
    Prior, John Olivier
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (05) : 371 - 377
  • [3] Indirect comparison of the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Xianwen
    Li, Dandan
    Liang, Zhigang
    Liao, Yan
    Yang, Ling
    Wang, Rui
    Wang, Pan
    Cai, Jiong
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for detecting peritoneal metastases: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laghi, Andrea
    Bellini, Davide
    Rengo, Marco
    Accarpio, Fabio
    Caruso, Damiano
    Biacchi, Daniele
    Di Giorgio, Angelo
    Sammartino, Paolo
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2017, 122 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [5] Predicting Complete Cytoreduction with Preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Csikos, Csaba
    Czina, Peter
    Molnar, Szabolcs
    Kovacs, Anna Rebeka
    Garai, Ildiko
    Krasznai, Zoard Tibor
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (16)
  • [6] Diagnostic Performance of MRI and FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Locoregional Staging of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sikkenk, Daan J.
    Henskens, Isabelle J.
    van de Laar, Bart
    Burghgraef, Thijs A.
    da Costa, David W.
    Somers, Inne
    Verheijen, Paul M.
    Nederend, Joost
    Nagengast, Wouter B.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    Consten, Esther C. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 223 (05)
  • [7] Imaging of oesophageal cancer with FDG-PET/CT and MRI
    van Rossum, P. S. N.
    van Lier, A. L. H. M. W.
    Lips, I. M.
    Meijer, G. J.
    Reerink, O.
    van Vulpen, M.
    Lam, M. G. E. H.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 70 (01) : 81 - 95
  • [8] Whole-Body MRI vs. PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhan, Yuefu
    Zhang, Guangming
    Li, Mingliang
    Zhou, Xiaobo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [9] Pretherapeutic Imaging for Axillary Staging in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ultrasound, MRI and FDG PET
    Le Boulc'h, Morwenn
    Gilhodes, Julia
    Steinmeyer, Zara
    Moliere, Sebastien
    Mathelin, Carole
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (07)
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT versus PET/CT for advanced ovarian cancer staging: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wilson, Mitchell P.
    Sorour, Sara
    Bao, Bo
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Man, Vincent
    Krill, Matthew
    Low, Gavin
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (06) : 2135 - 2144