Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted PET/CT with 18F-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor-74 for Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Cancer: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

被引:10
作者
Xu, Weizhi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cai, Jiayu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peng, Tianxing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meng, Tinghua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pang, Yizhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Long [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Hua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jingjing [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Chen, Xiaoyuan [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Chen, Haojun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nucl Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Minnan PET Ctr, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Xiamen Key Lab Radiopharmaceut, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Coll Design & Engn, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Coll Design & Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Singapore, Singapore
[8] ASTAR, Agcy Sci Technol & Res ASTAR, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 中国国家自然科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
PET; CT; 18F-FAPI-74; 18F-FDG; gastrointestinal tumors; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; GASTRIC-CANCER; TUMOR; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.123.266329
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Fibroblast activation protein is overexpressed in the stroma of several cancer types. F-18-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-74 is a PET tracer with high selectivity for fibroblast activation protein and has shown high accumulation in human tumors in clinical studies. However, the use of F-18-FAPI-74 for PET imaging of gastrointestinal cancer has not been systematically investigated. Herein, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of F-18-FAPI-74 (F-18-LNC1005) PET/CT in gastric, liver, and pancreatic cancers and compared the results with those of F-18-FDG PET/CT. Methods: This prospective study analyzed patients with confirmed gastric, liver, or pancreatic malignancies who underwent concurrent F-18-FDG and F-18-FAPI-74 PET/CT between June 2022 and December 2022. PET/CT findings were confirmed by histopathology or radiographic follow-up. F-18-FDG and F-18-FAPI-74 uptake and tumor-to-background ratios were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the 2 scans. Results: Our cohort consisted of 112 patients: 49 with gastric cancer, 39 with liver cancer, and 24 with pancreatic cancer. Among them, 69 patients underwent PET/CT for initial staging and 43 for recurrence detection. Regarding lesion-based diagnostic accuracy, F-18-FAPI-74 PET/CT showed higher sensitivity than did F-18-FDG in the detection of primary tumors (gastric cancer, 88% [22/25] vs. 60% [15/25], P = 0.016; liver cancer, 100% [22/22] vs. 82% [18/22], P = 0.125; pancreatic cancer, 100% [22/22] vs. 86% [19/22], P = 0.250), local recurrence (92% [23/25] vs. 56% [14/25]; P = 0.021), involved lymph nodes (71% [41/58] vs. 40% [23/58]; P < 0.001), and bone and visceral metastases (98% [350/358] vs. 47% [168/358]; P < 0.001). Compared with F-18-FDG, F-18-FAPI-74 PET/CT upstaged 17 patients' TNM staging among all treatment-na & iuml;ve patients (17/69, 25%) and changed the clinical management of 4 patients (4/43, 9%) in whom recurrence or metastases were detected. Conclusion: F-18-FAPI-74 PET/CT is superior to F-18-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary tumors, local recurrence, lymph node involvement, and bone and visceral metastases in gastric, pancreatic, and liver cancers, with higher uptake in most primary and metastatic lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 51
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Burkitt's lymphoma
    Karantanis, Dimitrios
    Durski, Jolanta M.
    Lowe, Val J.
    Nathan, Mark A.
    Mullan, Brian P.
    Georgiou, Evangelos
    Johnston, Patrick B.
    Wiseman, Gregory A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (01) : E68 - E73
  • [32] Direct comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma
    Cohade, C
    Osman, M
    Leal, J
    Wahl, RL
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (11) : 1797 - 1803
  • [33] Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: evaluation by 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Lima, Livia Maria Frota
    Packard, Annie T.
    Broski, Stephen M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 11 (02): : 77 - 86
  • [34] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Polyarteritis Nodosa
    Brown, Parker J.
    Huang, Steve
    Martinez, Felipe
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (12) : E682 - E684
  • [35] 18F-FLT PET/CT imaging is not competent for the pretreatment evaluation of metastatic gastric cancer: a comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging
    Zhou, Min
    Wang, Chenchen
    Hu, Silong
    Zhang, Yongping
    Yao, Zhifeng
    Li, Jin
    Guo, Weijian
    Zhang, Yingjian
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 34 (07) : 694 - 700
  • [36] Galactocele, Pitfall for the Evaluation by 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Ceyrat, Quentin
    Ziade, Caroline
    Tlili, Ghoufrane
    Fernandez, Philippe
    Meyer, Marie
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (07) : E237 - E238
  • [37] Update 2018: 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in Head and Neck Cancer
    Sanli, Yasemin
    Zukotynski, Katherine
    Mittra, Erik
    Chen, Delphine L.
    Nadel, Helen
    Niederkohr, Ryan D.
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (12) : E439 - E452
  • [38] Is SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET/CT Predictive Factor for Malignancy in Gastrointestinal Tract?
    Ozaslan, Ersin
    Kiziltepe, Melih
    Addulrezzak, Ummuhan
    Kula, Mustafa
    Bozkurt, Oktay
    Kut, Engin
    Duran, Ayse O.
    Ucar, Mahmut
    Sakalar, Teoman
    Dogan, Ender
    Topaloglu, Ulas S.
    Inanc, Mevlude
    Ozkan, Metin
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 24 (08) : 1217 - 1224
  • [39] 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of cancer cervix: Where do we stand today?
    Palaniswamy, Shanmuga S.
    Borde, Chaitanya R.
    Subramanyam, Padma
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (07) : 583 - 592
  • [40] Colon Sarcoidosis Mimicking Cancer at 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Mei, Riccardo
    Prediletto, Irene
    Nava, Stefano
    Fanti, Stefano
    Ambrosini, Valentina
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (05) : 387 - 388