Vortex-Induced Vibration Control for Twin Box Girder Bridges with Veritical Central Stabilzers

被引：0
|
作者：
Cheng Y. [1 ]
Zhou R. [2 ]
Yang Y. [3 ]
Ge Y. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Yanggo University, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou
[2] Institute of Urban Smart Transportation and Safety Maintenance, Shenzheng University, Shenzhen
[3] State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
来源：
Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University | 2019年 / 47卷 / 05期
关键词：
Computational fluid dynamics(CFD); Flow structures; Twin-box girder; Vertical central stabilizers; Vortex-induced vibration; Wind tunnel testing;
D O I：
10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2019.05.004
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Taking a twin-box girder bridge with a slot width ratio of 20% as an example, the control effects of upward vertical central stabilizers (UVCS) and downward vertical central stabilizers (DVCS) on the bridge were investigated using CFD simulation and a series of wind tunnel tests, respectively. The results show that the amplitudes of heaving vortex-induced vibration(VIV) responses first increase and then decrease with the height increase of vertical central stabilizers, in which the amplitudes of heaving VIV responses for the UVCS with 0.4h/H and the DVCS with 0.2h/H were the smallest. The amplitudes of torsional VIV responses were enhanced by installing the UVCS while the DVCS are helpful to decrease the torsional responses. In addition, the results of the CFD numerical simulation show that VCS change the motion mode of vortex structures in the slotting and the pressure zones on the upper and bottom surface of the leeward side girder. It is found that the optimal control effective on the VIV performance is the DVCS with 0.2h/H, whereas the UVCS with 0.8h/H has the worst effective of all cases. © 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of Tongji University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：617 / 626
页数：9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Matsumoto M., Mizunoc K., Flutter instability and recent development in stabilization of structures, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95, 9-11, (2007)
  • [2] Ueda T., Yasuda M., Nakagaki R., Mechanism of aerodynamic stabilization for long-span suspension bridge with stiffening truss-girder, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 33, 1-2, (2000)
  • [3] Yang Y., Zhou R., Ge Y., Practical flutter control method for long-span bridges, Joural of Tongji University(Natural Science), 42, 7, (2014)
  • [4] Zhao L., Ge Y., Guo Z., Et al., Reconsideration of wind-induced vibration mitigation of long-span cable supported bridges: effects of passive control and strategy of active control, China Civil Engineering Journal, 48, 12, (2015)
  • [5] Yang Y., Zhou R., Ge Y., Vortex-induced vibration and its control for long-span bridges with twin box girder, China Civil Engineering Journal, 47, 12, (2014)
  • [6] Yang Y., Zhou R., Luo D., Et al., Vortex-induced vibration and its control for twin-box girder bridges with various slot widths, Engineering Mechanics, 34, 7, (2017)
  • [7] Larsen A., Esdahl Y., Andersen J.E., Et al., Storebelt suspension bridge vortex shedding excitation and mitigation by guide vanes, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 88, 2-3, (2000)
  • [8] Xu F., Ding W., Jiang F., Et al., Development and prospect of study on vortex-induced vibration of long-span bridges, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 29, 10, (2010)
  • [9] Zhou R., Yang Y.X., Ge Y.J., Et al., Practical countermeasures for the aerodynamic performance of long span cable-stayed bridge with open deck, Wind and Structures, 21, 2, (2015)
  • [10] Fang G., Yang Y., Ge Y., Et al., Vortex-induced vibration performance and aerodynamic countermeasures of semi-open separated twin-box deck, China Civil Engineering Journal, 50, 3, (2017)
12