External costs of electricity generation in 27 European countries from 2010-2030: Pathway toward sustainability or business as usual?

被引:2
作者
Baumgaertner, Frank [1 ]
Letmathe, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Sch Business & Econ, Aachen, Germany
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; AIR-POLLUTION; NATURAL-GAS; FOSSIL-FUEL; POWER; HEALTH; COAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0294499
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Electricity generation in Europe is undergoing a fundamental change. The aim is to increase sustainability by reducing emissions. Each country has a different electricity mix, and there is no established method for measuring environmental impacts of electricity production with a single monetary indicator, in a uniform manner, and with country-specific data. To address this gap, a model that measures the costs of 19 environmental externalities (usually, types of emissions) has been developed. Using country-specific technologies, electricity mixes, and external cost rates, the development of external costs of generating electricity in 27 European countries between 2010 and 2030 is assessed and analyzed. The simulation results show that the external costs vary heavily between 2.1 and 22.4 euro cents per kWh in this period. Despite the initiated transformation of the energy systems in many EU countries, external costs per kWh are decreasing in only eight of them. This fact underlines the need for a drastic change in national energy strategies. Overall, the results show that more far-reaching policy measures are needed in order to significantly reduce the external costs of the energy sector in Europe. The article raises the level of granularity of research on the external costs of electricity in Europe by combining extensive country-specific emission data and country-specific external cost rates.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 121 条
[81]   Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: Practitioner and managerial considerations [J].
Pryshlakivsky, Jonathan ;
Searcy, Cory .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 309
[82]  
Pusinait R., 2005, Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, P193
[83]   Better sustainability assessment of green buildings with high-frequency data [J].
Qiu, Yueming ;
Kahn, Matthew E. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (11) :642-649
[84]   External Costs of Energy: How Much Is Clean Energy Worth? [J].
Rabl, Ari ;
Spadaro, Joseph V. .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (04)
[85]   External costs of nuclear: Greater or less than the alternatives? [J].
Rabl, Ari ;
Rabl, Veronika A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 57 :575-584
[86]   Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: Analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model [J].
Rafaj, Peter ;
Kypreos, Socrates .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (02) :828-843
[87]   A comparative analysis of electricity generation costs from renewable, fossil fuel and nuclear sources in G20 countries for the period 2015-2030 [J].
Ram, Manish ;
Child, Michael ;
Aghahosseini, Arman ;
Bogdanov, Dmitrii ;
Lohrmann, Alena ;
Breyer, Christian .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 199 :687-704
[88]   Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia [J].
Rasul, Golam .
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 18 :14-25
[89]   Coal-exit health and environmental damage reductions outweigh economic impacts [J].
Rauner, Sebastian ;
Bauer, Nico ;
Dirnaichner, Alois ;
Dingenen, Rita Van ;
Mutel, Chris ;
Luderer, Gunnar .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (04) :308-+
[90]   Applying ex post index decomposition analysis to final energy consumption for evaluating European energy efficiency policies and targets [J].
Reuter, Matthias ;
Patel, Martin K. ;
Eichhammer, Wolfgang .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2019, 12 (05) :1329-1357