Validation of international predictive nomograms for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in Hong Kong breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes

被引:0
作者
Wong, Yu Yan [1 ,2 ]
Kwok, Kam Hung [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Kowloon, 30 Gascoigne Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; sentinel lymph node (SLN); axillary lymph node dissection (ALND); nomogram; SCORING SYSTEM; INVOLVEMENT; LIKELIHOOD; DISSECTION; MORBIDITY; BIOPSY; STAGE;
D O I
10.21037/abs-21-20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Management of the axilla in breast cancer patients has been evolving over the past decade with progressive de-escalation in axillary surgery. In this study, we investigated the factors predicting non -sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases in sentinel lymph node (SLN) positive breast cancer patients in Hong Kong and assessed international predictive scoring systems [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Tenon score] for their accuracy and applicability in our locality.<br /> Methods: This is a retrospective study of 126 breast cancer patients who received completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN biopsy (SLNB) between April 2011 and April 2019. Their MSKCC, MDACC and Tenon predictive scores for NSLN metastases were compared with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of non -sentinel node metastases.<br /> Results: The majority had early disease, with only 7.1% (9 patients) having T3 disease. Only 35 patients (27.8%) had positive NSLN after axillary dissection. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of MDACC (0.708, 95% CI: 0.583-0.833) was the highest, followed by MSKCC (0.674, 95% CI: 0.553-0.795) and Tenon (0.660, 95% CI: 0.531-0.789). The AUROC improved after excluding patients with micrometastases only on SLNB. All three normograms showed poorer performance when there was only one positive SLN. Multivariate analysis found grade (OR: 0.107, 95% CI: 0.14-0.801, P=0.03), ratio of positive to negative SLN (OR: 0.005, 95% CI: 0.001-0.639, P=0.033) and extranodal spread (OR: 2.754, 95% CI: 0.979-7.745, P<0.05) as significant independent predictors of NSLN metastases.<br /> Conclusions: MSKCC, MDACC and Tenon scores all show acceptable accuracy in predicting NSLN metastases but are less accurate in patients with only one positive SLN or micrometastases. MDACC shows the best accuracy in our subset of patients in Hong Kong.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Predictive factors of non-sentinel lymph node disease in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph node [J].
Peyroteo, Mariana ;
Canotilho, Rita ;
Correia, Ana Margarida ;
Baia, Catarina ;
Ribeiro, Catia ;
Reis, Paulo ;
de Sousa, Abreu .
CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2022, 100 (02) :81-87
[12]   Risk factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes [J].
Zhang Tao ;
Wang Hong ;
Chen Bao-ping ;
Zhang Hai-song ;
Wei Xi-liang ;
Fu Ying ;
Li Zhong ;
Hu Geng-kun .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (20) :2107-2109
[13]   Positive non-sentinel axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer with 1-2 sentinel lymph node metastases [J].
Zheng, Jianwei ;
Cai, Shuyan ;
Song, Huimin ;
Wang, Yunlei ;
Han, Xiaofeng ;
Wu, Haoliang ;
Gao, Zhigang ;
Qiu, Fanrong .
MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (44)
[14]   Validation of online calculators to predict the non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients [J].
Tanaka, Satoru ;
Sato, Nayuko ;
Fujioka, Hiroya ;
Takahashi, Yuko ;
Kimura, Kosei ;
Iwamoto, Mitsuhiko .
SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (02) :163-170
[15]   Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastasis and Risk of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis: Validation of Two Breast Cancer Nomograms [J].
D'Eredita, Giovanni ;
Troilo, Vito Leopoldo ;
Giardina, Carmela ;
Napoli, Anna ;
Rubini, Giuseppe ;
Fischetti, Fernando ;
Berardi, Tommaso .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2010, 10 (06) :445-451
[16]   Additional non-sentinel lymph node metastases in early oral cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes [J].
Den Toom, Inne J. ;
Bloemena, Elisabeth ;
van Weert, Stijn ;
Karagozoglu, K. Hakki ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
de Bree, Remco .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (02) :961-968
[17]   Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study [J].
Coutant, Charles ;
Rouzier, Roman ;
Fondrinier, Eric ;
Marchal, Frederic ;
Guillemin, Francois ;
Seince, Nathalie ;
Rodrigues, Anabella ;
Darai, Emile ;
Uzan, Serge ;
Barranger, Emmanuel .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 113 (03) :537-543
[18]   Sentinel Lymph Node Positive Rate Predicts Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer [J].
Wang, Xuefei ;
Zhang, Guochao ;
Zuo, Zhichao ;
Zhu, Qingli ;
Wu, Shafei ;
Zhou, Yidong ;
Mao, Feng ;
Lin, Yan ;
Shen, Songjie ;
Zhang, Xiaohui ;
Qin, Xue ;
Yan, Cunli ;
Ma, Xiaoying ;
Shi, Yue ;
Sun, Qiang .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 271 :59-66
[19]   Multicentre validation of different predictive tools of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer [J].
Cserni, G. ;
Boross, G. ;
Maraz, R. ;
Leidenius, M. H. K. ;
Meretoja, T. J. ;
Heikkila, P. S. ;
Regitnig, P. ;
Luschin-Ebengreuth, G. ;
Zgajnar, J. ;
Perhavec, A. ;
Gazic, B. ;
Lazar, G. ;
Takacs, T. ;
Voros, A. ;
Audisio, R. A. .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2012, 21 (02) :59-65
[20]   Factors predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with 1-2 macrometastatic positive sentinel lymph nodes [J].
Dong, Bingbin ;
Li, Quan ;
Zhang, Mingxia ;
Wu, Wei ;
Yao, Yandan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10) :10836-10846