Validation of international predictive nomograms for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in Hong Kong breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes

被引:0
|
作者
Wong, Yu Yan [1 ,2 ]
Kwok, Kam Hung [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Kowloon, 30 Gascoigne Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; sentinel lymph node (SLN); axillary lymph node dissection (ALND); nomogram; SCORING SYSTEM; INVOLVEMENT; LIKELIHOOD; DISSECTION; MORBIDITY; BIOPSY; STAGE;
D O I
10.21037/abs-21-20
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Management of the axilla in breast cancer patients has been evolving over the past decade with progressive de-escalation in axillary surgery. In this study, we investigated the factors predicting non -sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases in sentinel lymph node (SLN) positive breast cancer patients in Hong Kong and assessed international predictive scoring systems [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Tenon score] for their accuracy and applicability in our locality.<br /> Methods: This is a retrospective study of 126 breast cancer patients who received completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN biopsy (SLNB) between April 2011 and April 2019. Their MSKCC, MDACC and Tenon predictive scores for NSLN metastases were compared with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of non -sentinel node metastases.<br /> Results: The majority had early disease, with only 7.1% (9 patients) having T3 disease. Only 35 patients (27.8%) had positive NSLN after axillary dissection. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of MDACC (0.708, 95% CI: 0.583-0.833) was the highest, followed by MSKCC (0.674, 95% CI: 0.553-0.795) and Tenon (0.660, 95% CI: 0.531-0.789). The AUROC improved after excluding patients with micrometastases only on SLNB. All three normograms showed poorer performance when there was only one positive SLN. Multivariate analysis found grade (OR: 0.107, 95% CI: 0.14-0.801, P=0.03), ratio of positive to negative SLN (OR: 0.005, 95% CI: 0.001-0.639, P=0.033) and extranodal spread (OR: 2.754, 95% CI: 0.979-7.745, P<0.05) as significant independent predictors of NSLN metastases.<br /> Conclusions: MSKCC, MDACC and Tenon scores all show acceptable accuracy in predicting NSLN metastases but are less accurate in patients with only one positive SLN or micrometastases. MDACC shows the best accuracy in our subset of patients in Hong Kong.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node: validation of five nomograms and development of a new predictive model
    Lombardi, Augusto
    Maggi, Stefano
    Lo Russo, Marzia
    Scopinaro, Francesco
    Di Stefano, Domenica
    Pittau, Maria Grazia
    Tiberi, Simone
    Amanti, Claudio
    TUMORI, 2011, 97 (06) : 749 - 755
  • [2] Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Perhavec, Andraz
    Perme, Maja Pohar
    Hocevar, Marko
    Besic, Nikola
    Zgajnar, Janez
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 119 (02) : 357 - 366
  • [3] Prediction of Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastases After Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Nomograms
    Gruber, Ines
    Henzel, Maja
    Schoenfisch, Birgitt
    Staebler, Annette
    Taran, Florin-Andrei
    Hahn, Markus
    Roehm, Carmen
    Helms, Gisela
    Oberlechner, Ernst
    Wiesinger, Benjamin
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    La Fougere, Christian
    Wallwiener, Diethelm
    Hartkopf, Andreas
    Krawczyk, Natalia
    Fehm, Tanja
    Brucker, Sara
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (07) : 4047 - 4056
  • [4] Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node
    Andraž Perhavec
    Maja Pohar Perme
    Marko Hočevar
    Nikola Besić
    Janez Žgajnar
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010, 119 : 357 - 366
  • [5] Risk factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes
    Zhang Tao
    Wang Hong
    Chen Bao-ping
    Zhang Hai-song
    Wei Xi-liang
    Fu Ying
    Li Zhong
    Hu Geng-kun
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 121 (20) : 2107 - 2109
  • [6] Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Metastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes
    McCarthy, A. J.
    O'Connor, K.
    O'Connell, F.
    Bennett, M. I. V.
    Browne, T. J.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 53A - 53A
  • [7] Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel nodes
    Hung, WK
    Chan, MCM
    Mak, KL
    Chong, SF
    Lau, Y
    Ho, CM
    Yip, AWC
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 75 (1-2) : 27 - 31
  • [8] Predicting Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Metastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes
    McCarthy, A. J.
    O'Connor, K.
    O'Connell, F.
    Bennett, M. W.
    Browne, T. J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 53A - 53A
  • [9] Nomograms for predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy
    Zheng, Lihua
    Liu, Feng
    Zhang, Shuo
    Zhao, Yaheng
    Liu, Yunjiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (52)
  • [10] A New and Simple Predictive Formula for Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes, and Validation of 3 Different Nomograms in Turkish Breast Cancer Patients
    Yeniay, Levent
    Carti, Erdem
    Karaca, Can
    Zekioglu, Osman
    Yararbas, Ulkem
    Yilmaz, Rasih
    Kapkac, Murat
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (05) : 397 - 402