Spatio-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of land disputes in China: Do socio-economic factors matter?

被引:17
作者
Zhang, Maomao [1 ]
Tan, Shukui [1 ]
Chen, Enqing [2 ]
Li, Jianxing [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Donghu Univ, Sch Educ & Foreign Languages, Wuhan 430212, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
Land disputes; Socio-economic factors; Panel threshold model; Spatial Durbin model; China; USE CONFLICTS; TENURE POLICY; URBANIZATION; COMPENSATION; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; EMISSIONS; SECURITY; DISTRICT; PRAXIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111938
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Land disputes pose significant challenges to social stability and development. In this paper, land dispute intensity (LDI) is measured at the provincial level in China from 2009 to 2018 and its spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors are explored. The ordinary least squares(OLS), spatial durbin model (SDM), geodetector model, and panel threshold model are used to explore the spatial spillover effects of LDI and its potential non-linear relationship with socio-economic factors. The results reveal that LDI is spatially distributed in a decentralized form, with local areas showing the structural characteristics of "single core, multiple clusters". The LDI exhibits a significant positive spatial autocorrelation and follows a "logarithmic" upward trend over time. The urbanization rate (UR), social security expenditures (SSE), and the number of land and resources institutions (NLRI) are important driving forces affecting LDI. The SSE and NLRI have a single threshold effect on the LDI, with a "V" shaped weakening trend, and the UR is an important factor causing nonlinear effects. Interestingly, the effect shifts from inhibition to stimulation when the SSE and NLRI cross the corresponding threshold value. This paper can provide new insights into the governance of land disputes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Land use conflicts in central Sudan: Perception and local coping mechanisms [J].
Adam, Yahia Omar ;
Pretzsch, Juergen ;
Darr, Dietrich .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 42 :1-6
[2]   Determining the relationships between climatic elements and thermal comfort and tourism activities using the tourism climate index for urban planning: a case study of Izmir Province Tourism climate index for urban planning [J].
Adiguzel, Fatih ;
Sert, Elif Bozdogan ;
Dinc, Yucel ;
Cetin, Mehmet ;
Gungor, Senay ;
Yuka, Pakize ;
Dogan, Ozlem Sertkaya ;
Kaya, Efdal ;
Karakaya, Kayhan ;
Vural, Ercan .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (3-4) :1105-1120
[3]   Optimum government size and economic growth in case of Indian states: Evidence from panel threshold model [J].
Akram, Vaseem ;
Rath, Badri Narayan .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 88 :151-162
[4]  
Alston L. J., 1999, Environment and Development Economics, V4, P135, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X99000121
[5]   Land reform policies, the sources of violent conflict, and implications for deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Alston, LJ ;
Libecap, GD ;
Mueller, B .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 39 (02) :162-188
[6]   Land tenure and conflict resolution: a game theoretic approach in the Narok district in Kenya [J].
Amman, HM ;
Duraiappah, AK .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2004, 9 :383-407
[7]  
Anselin L, 2002, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V27, P247, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00120.x
[8]  
[白呈明 BAI Chengming], 2007, [中国土地科学, China Land Science], V21, P35
[9]   Debating the land question in Africa [J].
Berry, S .
COMPARATIVE STUDIES IN SOCIETY AND HISTORY, 2002, 44 (04) :638-668
[10]   Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Raymond, Christopher M. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2014, 122 :196-208