A climate change risk assessment in aquaculture in Korea

被引:0
作者
Kim, Moo-Jin [1 ]
Han, In-Seong [2 ]
Lee, Joon-Soo [2 ]
Kim, Do-Hoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Marine & Fisheries Business & Econ, 45 Yongso Ro, Busan 48513, South Korea
[2] Natl Inst Fisheries Sci, Ocean Climate & Ecol Res Div, 216 Gijanghaean Ro, Busan 46083, South Korea
关键词
Climate change; Risk assessment; Aquaculture; SSP scenarios; FRESH-WATER; TEMPERATURE; SALMON; FUTURE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-024-03758-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global aquaculture production is steadily rising, and the aquaculture industry is assuming an increasingly vital role in economic aspects. Despite the growing importance of aquaculture on a global scale, climate change poses challenges to the future growth and stability of the aquaculture. In South Korea, marine aquaculture production is gradually increasing; however, higher sea temperatures caused by climate change are inflicting significant damage on the aquaculture industry. Accordingly, it is necessary to take measures to adapt to climate change, and assessing the level of risks facing the aquaculture from climate change is crucial as the first step in this process. In this study, we conducted the risk assessment to climate change for seventeen primary aquaculture species with sensitivity and impact attributes. As an impact attribute, we consider relationship between projected sea surface temperature and optimal and tolerable temperature by species to enable a more objective and quantitative assessment. The assessed risk scores were re-evaluated based on three criteria of the traffic light system to verify fish farming likelihoods by region. Based on the results, aquaculture was expected to face challenges in multiple areas in the future under the SSP5-8.5. Among the species, seaweed and sea squirt would become unviable for aquaculture in production regions in the future, highlighting the need for prioritized adaptation measures compared to other aquaculture species.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Aquaculture: Externalities and Policy Options
    Asche, Frank
    Eggert, Hakan
    Oglend, Atle
    Roheim, Cathy A.
    Smith, Martin D.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2022, 16 (02) : 282 - 305
  • [2] Barange Manuel, 2018, FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, V627, P611
  • [3] Battaglene SC, 2008, Report
  • [4] Brander K., 2017, Climate Change Impacts on Fisheries and Aquaculture, P45, DOI [10.1002/9781119154051.ch3, DOI 10.1002/9781119154051.CH3]
  • [5] Global fish production and climate change
    Brander, K. M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (50) : 19709 - 19714
  • [6] BRETT JR, 1971, AM ZOOL, V11, P99
  • [7] IPCC baseline scenarios have over-projected CO2 emissions and economic growth
    Burgess, Matthew G.
    Ritchie, Justin
    Shapland, John
    Pielke, Roger, Jr.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [8] Collins C., 2020, Mar Clim Chang Impacts Partnership Sci Rev, P482, DOI [DOI 10.14465/2020.ARC21.AQU, 10.14465/2020.arc21.aqu]
  • [9] The release of genetically modified crops into the environment - Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment
    Conner, AJ
    Glare, TR
    Nap, JP
    [J]. PLANT JOURNAL, 2003, 33 (01) : 19 - 46
  • [10] Assessing the risk of climate change to aquaculture: a case study from south-east Australia
    Doubleday, Zoe A.
    Clarke, Steven M.
    Li, Xiaoxu
    Pecl, Gretta T.
    Ward, Tim M.
    Battaglene, Stephen
    Frusher, Stewart
    Gibbs, Philip J.
    Hobday, Alistair J.
    Hutchinson, Neil
    Jennings, Sarah M.
    Stoklosa, Richard
    [J]. AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS, 2013, 3 (02) : 163 - 175