Shortening Acquisition Time and Improving Image Quality for Pelvic MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 1.5 T

被引:5
作者
Herrmann, Judith [1 ]
Benkert, Thomas [1 ]
Brendlin, Andreas [1 ]
Gassenmaier, Sebastian [1 ]
Hoelldobler, Thomas [1 ]
Maennlin, Simon [1 ]
Almansour, Haidara [1 ]
Lingg, Andreas [1 ]
Weiland, Elisabeth [1 ]
Afat, Saif [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tuebingen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Hoppe Seyler Str 3, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Diffusion-weighted imaging; Pelvic imaging; MRI; Deep learning reconstruction; SUPERRESOLUTION; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.06.035
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To determine the impact on acquisition time reduction and image quality of a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the pelvis at 1.5 T compared to standard DWI. Materials and Methods: A total of 55 patients (mean age, 61 +/- 13 years; range, 27-89; 20 men, 35 women) were consecutively included in this retrospective, monocentric study between February and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were (1) standard DWI (DWIS) in clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1.5 T and (2) DL-reconstructed DWI (DWIDL). All patients were examined using the institution's standard MRI protocol according to their diagnosis including DWI with two different b-values (0 and 800 s/mm(2)) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Image quality was qualitatively assessed by four radiologists using a visual 5-point Likert scale (5 = best) for the following criteria: overall image quality, noise level, extent of artifacts, sharpness, and diagnostic confidence. The qualitative scores for DWIS and DWIDL were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The overall image quality was evaluated to be significantly superior in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm(2), b = 800 s/mm(2), and ADC maps by all readers (P < .05). The extent of noise was evaluated to be significantly less in DWIDL compared to DWIS for b = 0 s/mm(2), b = 800 s/mm(2), and ADC maps by all readers (P < .001). No significant differences were found regarding artifacts, lesion detectability, sharpness of organs, and diagnostic confidence (P > .05). Acquisition time for DWIS was 2:06 minutes, and simulated acquisition time for DWIDL was 1:12 minutes. Conclusion: DL image reconstruction improves image quality, and simulation results suggest that a reduction in acquisition time for diffusion-weighted MRI of the pelvis at 1.5 T is possible.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 928
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Deep learning-accelerated image reconstruction in MRI of the orbit to shorten acquisition time and enhance image quality [J].
Estler, Arne ;
Zerweck, Leonie ;
Brunnee, Merle ;
Estler, Bent ;
Hauser, Till-Karsten ;
Richter, Vivien ;
Oergel, Anja ;
Buerkle, Eva ;
Becker, Hannes ;
Hurth, Helene ;
Stahl, Stephane ;
Konrad, Eva-Maria ;
Kelbsch, Carina ;
Ernemann, Ulrike ;
Gohla, Georg .
JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2024, 34 (02) :232-240
[32]   Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection [J].
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Chandarana, Hersh ;
Hindman, Nicole ;
Deng, Fang-Ming ;
Babb, James S. ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Geppert, Christian .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (11) :3170-3177
[33]   Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection [J].
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz ;
Hersh Chandarana ;
Nicole Hindman ;
Fang-Ming Deng ;
James S. Babb ;
Samir S. Taneja ;
Christian Geppert .
European Radiology, 2013, 23 :3170-3177
[34]   Deep learning reconstruction for brain diffusion-weighted imaging: efficacy for image quality improvement, apparent diffusion coefficient assessment, and intravoxel incoherent motion evaluation in in vitro and in vivo studies [J].
Hanamatsu, Satomu ;
Murayama, Kazuhiro ;
Ohno, Yoshiharu ;
Yamamoto, Kaori ;
Yui, Masao ;
Toyama, Hiroshi .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 29 (05) :664-673
[35]   Deep Learning-Enhanced T1-Weighted Imaging for Breast MRI at 1.5T [J].
Olthof, Susann-Cathrin ;
Nickel, Marcel Dominik ;
Weiland, Elisabeth ;
Leyhr, Daniel ;
Afat, Saif ;
Nikolaou, Konstantin ;
Preibsch, Heike .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2025, 15 (13)
[36]   Feasibility of deep learning k-space-to-image reconstruction for diffusion weighted imaging in patients with breast cancers: Focus on image quality and reduced scan time [J].
Lee, Eun Ji ;
Chang, Yun-Woo ;
Sung, Jae Kon ;
Thomas, Benkert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 157
[37]   Improving the noninvasive classification of glioma genetic subtype with deep learning and diffusion-weighted imaging [J].
Cluceru, Julia ;
Interian, Yannet ;
Phillips, Joanna J. ;
Molinaro, Annette M. ;
Luks, Tracy L. ;
Alcaide-Leon, Paula ;
Olson, Marram P. ;
Nair, Devika ;
LaFontaine, Marisa ;
Shai, Anny ;
Chunduru, Pranathi ;
Pedoia, Valentina ;
Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E. ;
Chang, Susan M. ;
Lupo, Janine M. .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) :639-652
[38]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: comparison of image quality between monopolar and bipolar acquisition schemes at 3T [J].
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz ;
Christian Geppert ;
Michael Kiritsy ;
Thorsten Feiweier ;
David J. Mossa ;
Hersh Chandarana .
Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 :289-298
[39]   Deep learning reconstruction of diffusion-weighted brain MRI for evaluation of patients with acute neurologic symptoms [J].
Park, Sang Ik ;
Yim, Younghee ;
Lee, Jung Bin ;
Ahn, Hye Shin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
[40]   Deep learning can reduce acquisition time of T2-weighted image in brain imaging [J].
El-Saeed Abou-ELMagd, Eman Hassan ;
Elmogy, Sabry Alameldin ;
Abdelzaher, Dina Gamal .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2025, 56 (01)