Exploring co-production in redirecting climate urbanism

被引:0
|
作者
Mohan, Anjali Karol [1 ]
Muraleedharan, Gayathri [1 ]
机构
[1] Integrated Design INDE, 3406-2 784,1 Floor,10th Main,34 A Cross,4th Block, Bangalore, India
关键词
Climate urbanism; climate action plan; bottom-up planning approaches; co-production; collaboration; urban poor; urban planning; ADAPTATION; RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; INDIA; STATE; PARTICIPATION; INNOVATIONS; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/17565529.2024.2339249
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Intensifying climate change and its impact on urban areas has led to the emergence of the climate urbanism model that advocates action at the intersection of urban development and climate change. The model has presented itself varyingly across geographies. While offering an opportunity for inclusionary development in some, in others it has exacerbated social injustice. In India, it echoes the flawed top-down, largely context-blind approach to urban planning, thus exacerbating urbanisation induced exclusions. Drawing on our involvement in the evolution of Community-based Climate Action Plans in Bhopal, India, the paper advocates for co-production as a pathway to inclusive climate urbanism. Given the ability of co-production to democratically improve services for and agency of the marginalised, the paper evidences the efficacy of co-production on (a) an equal acknowledgement of the strengths and limitations of the co-production partners, thereby facilitating negotiations on how and who would bridge these limitations; (b) negotiations that allow for the resolution of challenges and embedded power hierarchies between stakeholders; (c) the integration of climate and development actions as against a mere superimposition of the former onto development agendas; and; (d) the crucial role of decentralized local area engagement, one that affords the marginalized an agency to plan for themselves.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 152
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Banking on Participation: Exploring the Co-production of Population and Public in Swiss Biobanking
    Buhler, Nolwenn
    Barazzetti, Gaia
    Kaufmann, Alain
    TECNOSCIENZA-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, 2018, 9 (02): : 109 - 132
  • [22] Biodynamic farming research and transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: Exploring the synergies
    Rigolot, Cyrille
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2023, 32 (04): : 353 - 358
  • [23] Editorial: Public Participation in Health Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge
    Green, Gill
    Boaz, Annette
    Stuttaford, Maria
    FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 4
  • [24] Exploring Interactions in the Co-Production of Social Care Services with Vulnerable Citizens
    Gheduzzi, Eleonora
    Barello, Serena
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    Masella, Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2025, 48 (03) : 151 - 166
  • [26] The missing politics of urban vulnerability: The state and the co-production of climate risk
    Fraser, Arabella
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2017, 49 (12): : 2835 - 2852
  • [27] NOW OR NEVER: GOVERNANCE, CO-PRODUCTION AND BIOECONOMY AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    Torres Garcia, Cinthya Daianna
    OPERA-COLOMBIA, 2022, (31): : 179 - 184
  • [28] Climate Change and the Co-Production of Knowledge and Policy in Rural USA Communities
    Homsy, George C.
    Warner, Mildred E.
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2013, 53 (03) : 291 - 310
  • [29] A case for co-production
    Vikram, Anvita
    Siniscalchi, Madeleine
    Banerji, Anita
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2022, 35 : 4 - 4
  • [30] WHAT IS CO-PRODUCTION?
    Steadman, L.
    Dodgson, S.
    Taylor-Rose, A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2022, 28 : 15 - 15