Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Various Retreatment File Systems in the Removal of Gutta-Percha in Retreatment Cases and Time Taken During the Procedure: An In Vitro Cone Beam CT Study

Background Removing gutta-percha manually can be a challenging task, especially when addressing densely packed root -filling material, particularly in cases where resin -based sealers are employed for obturation. The use of nickel -titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments not only effectively shapes the root canal but also efficiently removes the endodontic filling from the curved canal during retreatment. Hence, incorporating rotary NiTi instruments in retreatment cases can alleviate fatigue for both patients and operators. Objectives This study aims to compare the efficacy of Neo-Endo retreatment files, R -Endo retreatment files, and K and H files in the removal of endodontic filling material. Additionally, the remnants of gutta-percha in root canals are evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods A total of 60 extracted first maxillary molar teeth were selected for this study. Canal preparation was conducted using the step -back method up to an apical size of 40 K -file. The obturation process involved the use of gutta-percha points and AH Plus sealer in a lateral compaction technique. Post -operative CBCT scans were taken. The samples were randomly divided according to the retreatment files used: group I included Neo-Endo retreatment files, group II included R -Endo retreatment files, and group III included conventional K -files and Hedstroem files (H -Files). The retreatment procedure was considered complete when the last instrument easily reached the working -length range and was physically clean. A stopwatch was used to record the time taken by each file to remove the obturating material. T1 represented the total time (including irrigation and change of file) required to reach the apex, while T2 indicated the complete removal of materials from the canal with the last instrument. The overall time recorded (TT) was calculated as T1 + T2. The removal process was analyzed with CBCT scans. Results The Neo-Endo retreatment files removed the filling materials better and more quickly than the other files. Conclusions Despite the presence of residual filling material in all samples, the Neo-Endo retreatment files left the least amount of residual filling material and achieved the shortest completion time.