Single or double needle insertion in twin's amniocentesis: Does the technique influence the risk of complications?

被引:6
作者
Krispin, E.
Wertheimer, A. [3 ]
Trigerman, S. [1 ,2 ]
Ben-Haroush, A.
Meizner, I.
Wiznitzer, A.
Bardin, R.
机构
[1] Beilinson Med Ctr, Helen Schneider Hosp Women, Rabin Med Ctr, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Helen Schneider Hosp Women, Rabin Med Ctr, IL-4941492 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
关键词
Twin pregnancy; Amniocentesis; Abortion; Needle insertion;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100051
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare complication rates following amniocentesis in twin gestations, according to sampling technique and number of needle insertions. Study design: A retrospective cohort study of all women with twin gestations who underwent amniocentesis and delivered in a single university affiliated medical center during 2002-2016. Amniocentesis was performed either through one uterine entry with passage through the inter-twin membrane or through two different entries to the two amniotic sacs. Pregnancy outcome of women that underwent single needle insertion amniocentesis, was compared to this of double needle insertion. Primary outcome was neonatal complications within 4 weeks after amniocentesis (late abortion, chorioamnionitis, preterm premature rupture of membranes, or hospitalization due to related symptoms). Secondary outcomes were gestational week at delivery and labor characteristics. Results: The study group comprised 212 women. Of them, 73 (34.4%) underwent a single uterine insertion and 139 (65.6%) two separate needle insertions. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. The amniocentesis complication rate was 13.7% in the single insertion group and 16.5% in the double insertion group (p = 0.587). Multivariate analysis found that a single insertion method had no statistically significant influence on complication rate, after making adjustments for potential confounders (OR = 1.085, 95% CI 0.4-2.9; p = 0.871). Other labor characteristics were similar between the groups. Conclusion: Needle insertion technique in twin gestation amniocentesis was not associated with procedure related complications. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
AGRAWAL S, 1995, HUM REPROD, V10, P2280
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, V56, P247
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Green top guideline No. 63. Antepartum haemorrhage, P1
[5]   ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss [J].
Atik, Ruth Bender ;
Christiansen, Ole Bjarne ;
Elson, Janine ;
Kolte, Astrid Marie ;
Lewis, Sheena ;
Middeldorp, Saskia ;
Nelen, Willianne ;
Peramo, Braulio ;
Quenby, Siobhan ;
Vermeulen, Nathalie ;
Goddijn, Mariette .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2018, 2018 (02)
[6]   Immune Etiology of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Its Diagnosis [J].
Beaman, Kenneth D. ;
Ntrivalas, Evangelos ;
Mallers, Timothy M. ;
Jaiswal, Mukesh K. ;
Kwak-Kim, Joanne ;
Gilman-Sachs, Alice .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 67 (04) :319-325
[7]  
BEER AE, 1981, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V141, P987
[8]   TREATMENT OF RECURRENT ABORTERS BY IMMUNIZATION WITH PATERNAL CELLS - CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
CAUCHI, MN ;
LIM, D ;
YOUNG, DE ;
KLOSS, M ;
PEPPERELL, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 1991, 25 (01) :16-17
[9]   Lymphocyte immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriages: Predictors of therapeutic success [J].
Cavalcante, Marcelo Borges ;
Sarno, Manoel ;
Niag, Marla ;
Pimentel, Kleber ;
Luz, Ivana ;
Figueiredo, Bianca ;
Michelon, Tatiana ;
Lima, Simone ;
Machado, Isabela Nelly ;
Araujo Junior, Edward ;
Barini, Ricardo ;
Neumann, Jorge .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 79 (06)
[10]   Lymphocyte immunotherapy in the treatment of recurrent miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cavalcante, Marcelo Borges ;
Sarno, Manoel ;
Araujo Junior, Edward ;
Costa, Fabricio Da Silva ;
Barini, Ricardo .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (02) :511-518