RESEARCH ON MAXIMUM POWER POINT TRACKING ALGORITHM OF PV ARRAY UNDER LOCAL SHADOW

被引:0
|
作者
Xie B. [1 ]
Li P. [1 ]
Su Y. [1 ]
Su J. [1 ]
Liu T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hefei University of Technology, Research Center for Photovoltaic System Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hefei
[2] State Grid Anhui Ultra High Voltage Company, Hefei
来源
Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica | 2023年 / 44卷 / 12期
关键词
grey wolf algorithm; improved artificial bee colony algorithm; maximum power point tracing; particle swarm optimization; PV modules;
D O I
10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1363
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Suffering from the multiple peaks of PV modules under local shadows,the traditional MPPT algorithms cannot accurately track their maximum power point. In the paper,three MPPT algorithms of PV modules based on artificial intelligence algorithms are studied,including particle swarm optimization algorithm,gray wolf algorithm,and improved artificial bee colony algorithm. This paper provides a detailed introduction to the principle and process of three artificial intelligence algorithms,and a simulation model of the system is established in Matlab/Simulink. By comparing the MPPT tracking performance of the three algorithms under static shadow occlusion and sudden shadow changes,the simulation results show that all three artificial intelligence algorithms can effectively track the maximum power point of PV modules,with the tracking errors less than 0.5%. Among them,particle swarm optimization algorithm has the highest tracking accuracy and the slowest convergence speed. The grey wolf algorithm has the lowest tracking accuracy and the fastest convergence speed. In terms of convergence stability,compared to the grey wolf algorithm and the improved artificial bee colony algorithm,the particle swarm optimization algorithm is more prone to track the local optima. © 2023 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] SU J H, YU S J,, ZHAO W,, Et al., Investigation on engineering analytical model of silicon solar cells[J], Acta energiae solaris sinica, 22, 4, pp. 409-412, (2001)
  • [2] ZHOU Y G, CHEN Q J,, HE C Y,, Et al., Model of pv array under partial shading and mppt control of multi- peak characteristics[J], Acta energiae solaris sinica, 37, 10, pp. 2484-2490, (2016)
  • [3] XU W., Modeling of photovoltaic power generation system and research on intelligent MPPT algorithm, (2021)
  • [4] ZHONG L P, ZHANG S P,, GU Q M., Study on the MPPT of series photovoltaic modules based on gene sequencing GA[J], Renewable energy resources, 35, 3, pp. 384-388, (2017)
  • [5] NEELAKANTAN P,, Et al., Optimization of partially shaded PV array using fuzzy MPPT [C], 2011 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities,Science and Engineering, pp. 481-486, (2012)
  • [6] HAN S P,, JIANG X Y,, LUO Y,, Et al., Photovoltaic mppt adaptive particle swarm optimization optimization under shading conditions[J], Acta energiae solaris sinica, 43, 6, pp. 99-105, (2022)
  • [7] ZHAO B, YUAN Q, WANG L, Et al., Multi-peak MPPT control of PV array based on improved alo algorithm[J], Acta energiae solaris sinica, 42, 9, pp. 132-139, (2021)
  • [8] LI Z., Research on tracking method of maximum power point of photovoltaic cells in partial shadows, (2021)
  • [9] SHEN L, HUANG Q Y,, Et al., Research on MPPT of photovoltaic under partial shading condition based on GWO- P&O algorithm[J], Journal of Hubei University of Technology, 37, 2, pp. 25-29, (2022)
  • [10] NIE L., Research on MPPT control strategy of photovoltaic power generation system under partial shadow[D], (2019)