Midfidelity model verification for a point-absorbing wave energy converter with linear power take-off

被引:0
|
作者
Katsidoniotaki E. [1 ]
Yu Y.-H. [2 ]
Göteman M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electrical Engineering, Division of Electricity at Uppsala University., Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Uppsala
[2] Water Power Program at National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver W Pkwy, Golden, 80401, CO
来源
International Marine Energy Journal | 2022年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
CFD; hydrodynamic analysis; numerical simulations; offshore renewables; point-absorber; verification; wave energy; wave-structure interaction; WEC-Sim;
D O I
10.36688/imej.5.67-75
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the preliminary design stage of a wave energy converter (WEC), researchers need fast and reliable simulation tools. High-fidelity numerical models are usually employed to study the wave-structure interaction, but the computational cost is demanding. As an alternative, midfidelity models can provide simulations in the order of real time. In this study, we operate Uppsala University’s WEC in a relatively mild sea state and model it using WEC-Sim. The model is verified based on OpenFOAM simulations. To analyze the ability of the midfidelity model to capture WEC dynamics, we investigate the system separately with 1, 2, and 3 degrees of freedom. We examine the contribution of viscous phenomena, and study both linear and weakly nonlinear solutions provided by WEC-Sim. Our results indicate that the viscous effects can be neglected in heave and surge motion, but not for pitch. We also find that the weakly nonlinear WEC-Sim solution successfully agrees with the computational fluid dynamics, whereas the linear solution could suggest misleading results. © 2022, European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hydrodynamic simulation of a floating wave energy converter by a U-tube rig for power take-off testing
    Falcao, A. F. de O.
    Pereira, P. E. R.
    Henriques, J. C. C.
    Gato, L. M. C.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2010, 37 (14-15) : 1253 - 1260
  • [43] Assessment of damping coefficients of power take-off systems of wave energy converters: A hybrid approach
    Rodriguez, Claudio A.
    Rosa-Santos, Paulo
    Taveira-Pinto, Francisco
    ENERGY, 2019, 169 : 1022 - 1038
  • [44] Performance characteristics and parameter analysis of a multi-DOF wave energy converter with hybrid power take-off systems
    Bao, Xingxian
    Li, Fumiao
    Sun, Huihui
    Iglesias, Gregorio
    Shi, Hongda
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 278
  • [45] Performance of a Direct-Driven Wave Energy Point Absorber with High Inertia Rotatory Power Take-off
    Thomas, Simon
    Giassi, Marianna
    Goeteman, Malin
    Hann, Martyn
    Ransley, Edward
    Isberg, Jan
    Engstroem, Jens
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (09)
  • [46] Hydrodynamic analysis of a dual-body wave energy converter device with two different power take-off configurations
    Souza Filho, J. C.
    Rezanejad, K.
    Guedes Soares, C.
    TRENDS IN MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING, MARTECH 2022, VOL 2, 2022, 8 : 499 - 508
  • [47] Survey of the mechanisms of power take-off (PTO) devices of wave energy converters
    Liu, Z.
    Zhang, R.
    Xiao, H.
    Wang, X.
    ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2020, 36 (03) : 644 - 658
  • [48] Hydraulic Power Take-Off Concepts for Wave Energy Conversion System: A Review
    Jusoh, Mohd Afifi
    Ibrahim, Mohd Zamri
    Daud, Muhamad Zalani
    Albani, Aliashim
    Yusop, Zulkifli Mohd
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (23)
  • [49] Wave Power Extraction with Constrained Power Take-Off: Single Capture vs. Double Capture Point Absorbers
    Bozzetto, Alessandro
    Tedeschi, Elisabetta
    2014 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGIES (EVER), 2014,
  • [50] Power capture and power take-off load of a self-balanced dual-flap oscillating surge wave energy converter
    Ahmed, Alaa
    Mi, Jia
    Huang, Jianuo
    Datla, Raju
    Connington, Kevin
    Zuo, Lei
    Hajj, Muhammad R.
    ENERGY, 2024, 291