Fast unsteady method for non-linear aeroelastic responses of flexible aircraft wings encountering wind gusts

被引:0
作者
Chandre-Vila, Oriol [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boin, Jean -Philippe [1 ]
Nivet, Yann [1 ]
Marquier, Sylvie [1 ]
Morlier, Joseph [2 ]
Gourdain, Nicolas [3 ]
机构
[1] Airbus Operat SAS, Aerolast & Loads Dept, 316 Route Bayonne, F-31300 Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Toulouse, ICA, ISAE SUPAERO, MINES ALBI,UPS,INSA,CNRS, 3 Rue Caroline Aigle, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[3] ISAE SUPAERO, Aerodynam Energet & Prop Dept, 10 Ave Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France
关键词
Aeroelasticity; Unsteady aerodynamics; Fast methods; Gust loads;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104095
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Given the current context of changes in aeronautics to reduce emissions, it is also necessary to modernise the computation methods to anticipate future cases where disciplines which are now calculated separately (i.e. manoeuvers and gusts) should be computed at the same time including flexible effects and using a time -domain approach. In this work, a static aeroelasticity formulation is adapted to compute wind gust loads. This static method uses aerodynamic matrices to calculate an effective angle of attack (used to recover the local pressure coefficients) from a structural deformation. The approach has been to define this deformation including unsteady effects influence in order to use the same formulation as the static case. Three gust cases (two unsteady and one quasi -steady) have been tested in a rectangular wing, and the proposed method has been compared to the aeroelastic high-fidelity solution and to an uncorrected version of the Doublet Lattice Method (Nastran Solution 146). The proposed solution benefits from the use of the lookup tables to accurately estimate the peak lift coefficient value (maximum error of 6.7%) at least 2.5 times faster than the Doublet Lattice Method. Nevertheless, using a limited model with only two degrees of freedom prevents the proposed method from capturing complex dynamics coming from highly unsteady gust excitation or from aerodynamic instabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 2018 APPL AERODYNAMI, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2018-3632
[2]   Numerical analysis of store-induced limit-cycle oscillation [J].
Beran, PS ;
Khot, NS ;
Eastep, FE ;
Snyder, RD ;
Zweber, JV .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2004, 41 (06) :1315-1326
[3]   Unsteady Lifting Line Theory Using the Wagner Function for the Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Modeling of 3D Wings [J].
Boutet, Johan ;
Dimitriadis, Grigorios .
AEROSPACE, 2018, 5 (03)
[4]  
Castells-Marin P., 2020, AIAA SCITECH 2020 FO, DOI [10.2514/6.2020-0755, DOI 10.2514/6.2020-0755]
[5]   Fast Nonlinear Static Aeroelasticity Method for High-Aspect-Ratio Wings at Different Mach Regimes [J].
Chandre-Vila, Oriol ;
Boin, Jean-Philippe ;
Barriety, Bernard ;
Nivet, Yann ;
Morlier, Joseph ;
Gourdain, Nicolas .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2023, 60 (04) :1017-1037
[6]   Possible Impacts of Climate Change on Wind Gusts under Downscaled Future Climate Conditions: Updated for Canada [J].
Cheng, Chad Shouquan ;
Lopes, Edwina ;
Fu, Chao ;
Huang, Zhiyong .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2014, 27 (03) :1255-1270
[7]   Robust Gust Alleviation and Stabilization of Very Flexible Aircraft [J].
Cook, Robert G. ;
Palacios, Rafael ;
Goulart, Paul .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (02) :330-340
[8]   Linear Frequency Domain and Harmonic Balance Predictions of Dynamic Derivatives [J].
Da Ronch, A. ;
McCracken, A. J. ;
Badcock, K. J. ;
Widhalm, M. ;
Campobasso, M. S. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2013, 50 (03) :694-707
[9]  
Dowell E. H., 1989, Mechanics: Dynamical Systems Series
[10]  
European Union Aviation Safety Agency E., 2021, CS-25 large aeroplanes (amendment 27)