Laser noise residuals in LISA from on-board processing and time-delay interferometry

被引:5
|
作者
Staab, Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lilley, Marc [3 ]
Bayle, Jean-Baptiste [4 ]
Hartwig, Olaf [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Grav Phys, Albert Einstein Inst, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[3] Sorbonne Univ, Univ PSL, SYRTE, Observ Paris,CNRS,LNE, 61 Ave Observ Paris, F-75014 Paris, France
[4] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland
[5] Max Planck Inst Grav Phys, Albert Einstein Inst, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043040
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Time-delay interferometry (TDI) is a crucial step in the on-ground data processing pipeline of the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), as it reduces otherwise overwhelming laser noise and allows for the detection of gravitational waves (GWs). This being said, several laser noise couplings have been identified that limit the performance of TDI. First, on-board processing, which is used to decimate the sampling rate from tens of MHz down to a few Hz, requires careful design of the antialiasing filters to mitigate folding of laser noise power into the observation band. Furthermore, the flatness of those filters is important to limit the effect of the flexing-filtering coupling. Second, the postprocessing delays applied in TDI are subject to ranging and interpolation errors. All of these effects are partially described in the literature. In this paper, we present them in a unified framework and give a more complete description of aliased laser noise and the coupling of interpolation errors. Furthermore, for the first time, we discuss the impact of laser locking on laser noise residuals in the final TDI output. To verify the validity of the analytic power spectral density (PSD) models we derive, we run numerical simulations using LISA INSTRUMENT and calculate secondgeneration TDI variables with PYTDI. We consider a setup with six independent lasers and with locked lasers (locking configuration N1-12). We find that laser locking indeed affects the laser noise residuals in the TDI combinations as it introduces correlations among the six lasers inducing slight modulations of the PSDs compared to the case of six independent lasers. This implies further studies on laser noise residuals should consider the various locking configurations to produce accurate results.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Time-delay interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev V.
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [22] Time-Delay Interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev V.
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2005, 8 (1)
  • [23] Time-Delay Interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev V.
    LIVING REVIEWS IN RELATIVITY, 2014, 17
  • [24] The evaluation for plasma noise in arbitrary time-delay interferometry combinations
    Zhao, Xin-Lei
    Wang, Pan-Pan
    Shao, Cheng-Gang
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2024, 41 (10)
  • [25] Synthetic LISA: Simulating time delay interferometry in a model LISA
    Vallisneri, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2005, 71 (02): : 022001 - 1
  • [26] LISA laser noise cancellation test using time-delayed interferometry
    Kuhnert, AC
    Spero, R
    Abramovici, A
    Schumaker, B
    Shaddock, D
    GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE DETECTION, 2003, 4856 : 74 - 77
  • [27] Discriminating a gravitational-wave background from instrumental noise using time-delay interferometry
    Tinto, M
    Armstrong, JW
    Estabrook, FB
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2001, 18 (19) : 4081 - 4086
  • [28] Characterizing instrumental noise and stochastic gravitational wave signals from combined time-delay interferometry
    Wang, Gang
    Li, Bin
    Xu, Peng
    Fan, Xilong
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (04)
  • [29] Matrix representation of time-delay interferometry
    Tinto, Massimo
    Dhurandhar, Sanjeev
    Joshi, Prasanna
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 104 (04)
  • [30] Experimental Demonstration of Time-Delay Interferometry for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
    de Vine, Glenn
    Ware, Brent
    McKenzie, Kirk
    Spero, Robert E.
    Klipstein, William M.
    Shaddock, Daniel A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 104 (21)