Comparative Politics of International Environmental Agreements and the EU

被引:0
作者
Guclu, Mehmet [1 ]
Tumer, Elif Korkmaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Yzmir, Turkiye
关键词
item response models; multilateral environmental agreements; environmental policy; ranking; democracy; PERFORMANCE; CORRUPTION; TREATY;
D O I
10.24818/18423264/58.1.24.14
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers the long-standing debate in the field of leaders and laggards of environmental policy in Europe. Although there exists a large body of literature on the subject, previous studies reveal mixed results due to methodological limitations and operationalisation issues, leading to a lack of empirical evidence. In this paper, we propose an empirical strategy to rank the environmental policy performance of EU Member States based on the 'commitment' to international environmental treaties and the 'difficulty' of their treaty collection. We use a multilevel partial credit model from the Rasch family of item response models. We compare the descriptive and explanatory models to examine the impact of country -specific characteristics on country ranking. The results suggest that well-known environmental leaders maintain consistent performance over time. However, some of the socalled laggards have fared better after considering country -specific factors, suggesting that the methodology used to assess performance is crucial in evaluating the progress achieved by the Member States. Our results provide a transparent ranking of the Member States which is necessary to develop sound policies and legal rules for environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 228
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Rationale and Design of the Environmental Conventions Index [J].
Escobar-Pemberthy, Natalia ;
Ivanova, Maria .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
[42]   Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: the case of biodiversity [J].
Velazquez Gomar, Jose Octavio .
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS-POLITICS LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 16 (04) :525-541
[43]   Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: the case of biodiversity [J].
José Octavio Velázquez Gomar .
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2016, 16 :525-541
[44]   Information asymmetry in voluntary environmental agreements: theory and evidence from UK climate change agreements [J].
Adetutu, Morakinyo O. ;
Stathopoulou, Eleni .
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2021, 73 (02) :644-670
[45]   The impact of international sanctions on environmental performance [J].
Fu, Qiang ;
Chen, Yin E. ;
Jang, Chyi-Lu ;
Chang, Chun-Ping .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 745
[46]   Intelligence, democracy, and international environmental commitment [J].
Obydenkova, Anastassia ;
Salahodjaev, Raufhon .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 147 :82-88
[47]   The Religious Characteristics of States: Classic Themes and New Evidence for International Relations and Comparative Politics [J].
Brown, Davis ;
James, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2018, 62 (06) :1340-1376
[48]   Aligning International Investment Agreements with the Sustainable Development Goals [J].
Johnson, Lise ;
Sachs, Lisa ;
Lobel, Nathan .
COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW, 2020, 58 (01) :58-120
[49]   Agreements of economic integration and the choice of national environmental policies [J].
Weder R. ;
Ziegler A.R. .
European Journal of Law and Economics, 2002, 13 (3) :239-256
[50]   Effects of funding mechanisms on participation in multilateral environmental agreements [J].
Steffen Mohrenberg ;
Vally Koubi ;
Thomas Bernauer .
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2019, 19 :1-18