Proposed automated contrast-enhanced microscopical method for evaluating air void structure in compacted asphalt concrete mixtures

There is no direct, less expensive, and practical method to measure the interconnectivity and parameters of air voids in asphalt mixtures other than the total air void volume calculated traditionally using bulk and maximum theoretical specific gravities. Unlike the conventional method, this paper proposes a method that is suitable for advanced applications and studies, such as for the evaluation of air void distribution and air void gradient to model and simulate long-term aging, predict top-down fatigue cracking, evaluate the effectiveness of compaction of thick lifts, and satisfy the representative volume element (RVE) requirements (a homogenous and representative specimen) for performance tests. Developing the proposed compact asphalt evaluation method included modifying the sample preparation methods and analysis from the American Society of Testing & Materials (ASTM), C457 Method C, and recently applied in the analyses of two independent studies at the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The first study was focused on checking the air void distribution within the small specimen for dynamic modulus and uniaxial cyclic fatigue tests using AASHTO TP 132 and TP 133, respectively. Results of air void analyses conducted on the interior and exterior sides of several slices sawn from different compacted asphalt mixtures consistently showed that the air void contents on the external sides are higher than on the interior. The second study was to evaluate whether the thicker-than-typical lift thickness to nominal maximum aggregate (NMAS) ratio was causing any top-to-bottom air void gradient in the pavement. Results showed that air void sizes and contents are consistently higher along the top ends of all the cores, and the total air void contents measured using the new method on several specimens from the field were comparable with the indirectly calculated air void percent with up to +/- 0.4 percent random error. Overall, the new method is practical to apply to larger-size samples and is a tool that both agencies and contractors can use for confirming in situ void uniformity. Its application can support innovations and improve performance in asphalt pavement construction.