Evaluating the impact of a trial of labor after cesarean section on labor duration: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Ooba, Hikaru [1 ]
Maki, Jota [1 ]
Masuyama, Hisashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho,Kita Ku, Okayama, Okayama Prefect 7008558, Japan
关键词
Labor duration; Trial of labor after cesarean section; Vaginal birth; Cesarean section; Propensity scores; IPTW; VAGINAL BIRTH; WOMEN; DELIVERY; CLASSIFICATION; RATES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-024-06744-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundCesarean section (C-section) rates are increasing globally, and repeated C-sections are associated with increased maternal morbidity. Trial of labor after C-section (TOLAC) is an approach to reduce the recurrence of C-sections. However, limited research exists on the impact of cesarean scars on labor duration in TOLAC, considering the termination of labor through C-section and selection bias. This study aimed to investigate the impact of cesarean scars on labor duration in TOLAC participants, accounting for potential confounding factors and biases.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 2,964 women who attempted vaginal birth at a single center in Japan from 2012 to 2021. The study categorized participants into TOLAC (n = 187) and non-TOLAC (n = 2,777) groups. Propensity scores were calculated based on 14 factors that could influence labor duration, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for labor duration, with and without IPTW adjustment. Sensitivity analyses used propensity score matching, bootstrapping, and interval censoring to address potential biases, including recall bias in the reported onset of labor.ResultsThe unadjusted HR for labor duration in the TOLAC group compared to the non-TOLAC group was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.98, P = 0.027), indicating a longer labor duration in the TOLAC group. After adjusting for confounding factors using IPTW, the HR was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.74-1.30, P = 0.91), suggesting no significant difference in labor duration between the groups. Sensitivity analyses using propensity score matching, bootstrapping, and interval censoring yielded consistent results. These findings suggested that the apparent association between TOLAC and longer labor duration was because of confounding factors rather than TOLAC itself.ConclusionsAfter adjusting for confounding factors and addressing potential biases, cesarean scars had a limited impact on labor duration in TOLAC participants. Maternal and fetal characteristics may have a more substantial influence on labor duration.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia - effect on subsequent trial of labor [J].
Abildgaard, Helle ;
Ingerslev, Marie Diness ;
Nickelsen, Carsten ;
Secher, Niels Joergen .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (02) :193-197
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, 2019, Obstet Gynecol Internet, V133, P110
[3]   Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) :3661-3679
[4]   Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture [J].
Bujold, E ;
Blackwell, SC ;
Gauthier, RJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (01) :18-23
[5]   Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? [J].
Cahill, Alison G. ;
Stamilio, David M. ;
Odibo, Anthony O. ;
Peipert, Jeffrey F. ;
Ratcliffe, Sarah J. ;
Stevens, Erika J. ;
Sammel, Mary D. ;
Macones, George A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) :1143-1147
[6]   Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes [J].
Carroll, CS ;
Magann, EF ;
Chauhan, SP ;
Klauser, CK ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) :1516-1520
[7]  
CHAZOTTE C, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V75, P350
[8]   Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes [J].
Grantz, Katherine L. ;
Gonzalez-Quintero, Victor ;
Troendle, James ;
Reddy, Uma M. ;
Hinkle, Stefanie N. ;
Kominiarek, Michelle A. ;
Lu, Zhaohui ;
Zhang, Jun .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (02) :226.e1-226.e6
[9]   Normal First Stage of Labor in Women Undergoing Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery [J].
Graseck, Anna S. ;
Odibo, Anthony O. ;
Tuuli, Methodius ;
Roehl, Kimberly A. ;
Macones, George A. ;
Cahill, Alison G. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) :732-736
[10]   Advanced Statistics: Bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with "difficult" distributions [J].
Haukoos, JS ;
Lewis, RJ .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (04) :360-365