The Postmodern Paradigm: Shaping the Philosophy for the Future Landscape of Public Administration

被引:1
作者
Akopian, Valerii [1 ]
Zakharenko, Kostyantyn [2 ]
Zhyzhko, Tetiana [3 ]
机构
[1] Dragomanov Ukrainian State Univ, Philosoph Sci, Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Dragomanov Ukrainian State Univ, Polit Sci, Kiev, Ukraine
[3] Dragomanov Ukrainian State Univ, Philosoph Sci, Kiev, Ukraine
来源
PHILOSOPHY AND COSMOLOGY-FILOSOFIYA I KOSMOLOGIYA | 2024年 / 32卷
关键词
Philosophy; Postmodernism; Public Administration; Future Governance; Technological Impact;
D O I
10.29202/phil-cosm/32/5
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This article delves into the profound impact of postmodernism on the trajectory and evolution of future public administration. The 20th century witnessed radical changes in worldview, marking the transition from modernity to postmodernity. The basic principles of postmodernism, encompassing deconstruction, fragmentation, future shock, and cultural relativism, have instigated a paradigm shift challenging traditional administrative frameworks (M. Foucault, J. -F. Lyotard, A. Toffler, etc.). The article explores how these postmodern tenets influence administrative practices, power structures, and the very nature of governance. Postmodernity is characterized by a unique attitude towards truth, acknowledging its relativity, and by decentration, the absence of a single center, replaced by multipolarity and globalization. "Post -truth" replaces truth, posing new challenges to the future of public administration. The public administration of the future will be shaped by existing trends, including Public -Private Partnerships (PPP), Non -Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), etc. It will also depend on modern technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, data analysis, and data -driven decision -making, as underscored by the need for digitalization in response to the pandemic (according to EIB). However, alongside advantages, there are also challenges, such as issues of liability in the use of AI for future public administration. These risks can be mitigated through collaborative and participatory governance models, adaptive leadership, an emphasis on inclusivity, diversity, and social equity, addressing environmental concerns, advanced training courses, and other strategic measures.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 86
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, EIB Investment Report 2021/2022: Recovery as a springboard for change
[2]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[3]  
Arendt Hannah., 2005, Essays in Understanding: 1930-1954
[4]  
Bouckaert G., 2020, European Perspectives for Public Administration the Way Forward, pp, P71, DOI [10.2307/j.ctvv417th.8, DOI 10.2307/J.CTVV417TH.8]
[5]  
Brahms Yael., 2020, Philosophy of Post-Truth
[6]  
Burke BrendanF., 2007, ADM THEORY PRAXIS, V29, P412, DOI DOI 10.1080/10841806.2007.11029604
[7]  
Canfora P., 2019, JRC Science for Policy Report, DOI [10.2760/952965, DOI 10.2760/952965]
[8]   Artificial Intelligence for data-driven decision-making and governance in public affairs [J].
Charles, Vincent ;
Rana, Nripendra P. ;
Carter, Lemuria .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2022, 39 (04)
[9]  
Dator Jim., 2006, Fairness, Globalization, and Public Institutions: East Asia and Beyond, P13
[10]  
FOUCAULT M, 1980, POWER KNOWLEDGE SELE, DOI DOI 10.17763/haer.57.4.kj517305m7761218