Optimization of Measurement Condition for Determination of Tritium in Air by Liquid Scintillation Counting

被引:0
作者
Dong C. [1 ,2 ]
Gou J. [1 ,2 ]
Pu X. [1 ,2 ]
Tang M. [1 ,2 ]
Wu Y. [1 ,2 ]
Wang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Wang L. [1 ,2 ]
Chen L. [1 ,2 ]
Li W. [1 ,2 ]
Li J. [1 ,2 ]
Gao J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Engineering Laboratory for Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning and Radvuaste Management, Nuclear Poiver Institute of China, Chengdu
[2] Reactor Operation and Application Sub-institute, Nuclear Poiver Institute of China, Chengdu
来源
Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology | 2023年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
air; counting interval; liquid scintillation counter; minimum detectable concentration; tritium;
D O I
10.7538/yzk.2022.youxian.0689
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the operation of the reactor, a large amount of tritium is released into the surrounding air through the waste gas treatment system and the plant ventilation system. Tritium is very easy to replace hydrogen in water molecules, and can enter the human body through breathing, resulting in internal radiation hazards. Therefore, it is necessary to study the measurement of tritium in ambient air. At present, there is no national or industrial standard for the measurement of tritium in air. In this paper, the liquid scintillation counter was used to measure the activity concentration of tritium in air. It is found that the detection limit of the activity concentration of tritium in the air mainly depends on ambient temperature, relative humidity, sample amount, detection efficiency of the instrument, background count rate of the instrument, measurement time, etc. Among them, ambient temperature and relative humidity are inherent characteristics of air samples. Therefore, in order to reduce the detection limit and shorten the measurement time as much as possible, three aspects must be considered which is reducing the background count rate, improving the detection efficiency and increasing the sample volume. Possible approaches include selecting background water and scintillation fluid with the lowest possible counts, selecting the appropriate counting area, and optimizing the mixing ratio of sample and scintillation fluid. In order to reduce the effect of water and scintillation fluid on the background, 11 different sources of background water and 3 types of scintillation fluid were selected for testing. The samples were prepared according to the ratio of 8 mL of water to 12 mL of scintillation fluid, and the long-term counting measurement was carried out after being stored in the dark for 24 h. The measurement results show that the count rate range of the background water sample varies from 2. 373 min-1 to 3. 441 min-1, and the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value is 1. 068 min-1, which also shows that the selection of the background water sample is very critical. For three scintillation fluids including Gold Star Quanta, OtpiPhase HiSafe 3 and Ultima Gold LLT, there is no significant difference in background and detection efficiency. In order to further reduce the detection limit, a figure of merit (FOM) was introduced, which is the ratio of the square of the detection efficiency of the radionuclide of interest to the background count rate. To maximize FOM, it is necessary to reduce the sample background count rate while maintaining a high detection efficiency, which can be achieved by optimizing the count area. By changing the lower threshold (LL) and upper threshold (UL) of the pulse height discriminator, a series of counted regions and the corresponding FOM can be obtained. The optimal count interval is 0. 35-4. 35 keV, which maximizes FOM. For full spectrum counting, the sample detection efficiency is 29. 27% and the background counting rate is 6. 53 min-1, from which the FOM is calculated to be 131. 2. After optimizing the counting area, although the detection efficiency is only 25.62%, the background is only 2. 42 min-1, and the FOM reaches 271. 2. The optimization of the counting interval reduces the detection efficiency from 29. 27% to 25. 62%, a decrease of 12. 47%. But there is an even bigger reduction in background, at 170%. In terms of optimizing the combination of water and scintillation fluid, samples were prepared and measured with water contents of 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, and 55%, respectively. The comparison results show that when the water content is 40% and 45%, the quality factor of the measurement system reaches the maximum, and the detection limit reaches the minimum. Tritium in air was measured under optimized conditions. The detection limit of typical samples is 20 mBq/m3, and the measurement time is 16 h, which is 1/2 shorter than that of full spectrum counting. © 2023 Atomic Energy Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1664
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
CHEN Haiying, ZHANG Chunming, WANG Shaowei, Et al., Calculation analysis of tritium source term in PWR, Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 50, 3, pp. 459-463, (2016)
[2]  
LI Xiaoyun, PAN Jingshun, LOU Hailin, Et al., Measurement of released tritium from nuclear facilities bydirect liquid scintillation counting, Radiation Protection, 39, 2, pp. 111-116, (2019)
[3]  
GUENB L., Impact of tritium around EDF nuclear power plant, Journal of Radiological Protection, 29, 2, pp. 163-167, (2009)
[4]  
PALOMO M, PEN-ALVER A, AGUILAR C, Et al., Tritium activity levels in environmental water samples from different origins, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 65, 9, pp. 1048-1053, (2007)
[5]  
MENG Dan, WANG Weijuan, ZHOU Xu, Et al., Development of the low temperature resolving-liquid scintillation counting method for tritiumac-tivity measurement in plant, Nuclear Electronics & Detection Technology, 36, 5, pp. 470-473, (2016)
[6]  
SHEN Huifang, QIAN Yuan, DU Lin, Et al., Overview of organically bound tritium in plant for atmospheric release of tritium from nuclear installation, Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 48, 10, pp. 1767-1774, (2014)
[7]  
BOYER C, VICHOT L, FROMM M, Et al., Tritium in plants: A review of current knowledge[J], Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67, 1, pp. 34-51, (2009)
[8]  
DIABAT S, STRACK S., Organically bound tritium, Health Physics, 65, 6, pp. 698-712, (1993)
[9]  
KIM S B, KOROLEVYCH V., Quantification of exchangeable and non-exchangeable organically bound tritium (OBT) in vegetation, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 118, pp. 9-14, (2013)
[10]  
DONG Chuanjiang, GOU Jiayuan, JIN Tao, Et al., Influence analysis on the radiation environment of high-flux engineering test reactor, Sichuan Environment, 36, pp. 114-117, (2017)