MITIGATING PRODUCT DATA MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN THE WOODEN SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSE INDUSTRY

被引：0
作者：
Vestin A. [1 ]
Säfsten K. [1 ]
Popovic D. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Engineering, Jönköping University, P.O. Box 1026, Jönköping
[2] OBOS Sweden AB, Myresjö
来源：
Journal of Information Technology in Construction | 2023年 / 28卷
关键词：
building information modelling; design research methodology; industrialized house building; interoperability; product data management; product lifecycle management; support system; system integration;
D O I：
10.36680/J.ITCON.2023.039
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The housing industry faces challenges in product data management, resulting in negative effects on productivity, efficiency, and quality. The purpose of the study presented in this paper is to elaborate on requirements and functions of a support system to mitigate challenges with product data management in the wooden single-family house industry. As a support system, a pilot product lifecycle management (PLM) system was developed with functions to fulfill the requirements. The support system was installed and tested in a real-world setting, a wooden single-family house company, Company T. The paper contributes with the insights that a PLM system for industrialized house building can be developed, fulfilling the requirements in this specific industry. The functions developed were perceived to have value and could, for Company T, mitigate their challenges with product data management. The support system facilitate integration between the pilot PLM system, the building information modeling tool and the enterprise resource planning system at Company T. Based on the study carried out, the paper concludes that a PLM system is feasible, and that it might be a way to mitigate challenges with product data management in the wooden single-family house industry. © 2023 The author(s).
引用
收藏
页码：757 / 773
页数：16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Aram S., Eastman C., Integration of PLM solutions and BIM systems for the AEC industry, Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2013): Building the Future in Automation and Robotics, pp. 1046-1055, (2013)
  • [2] Babic N. C., Podbreznik P., Rebolj D., Integrating resource production and construction using BIM, Automation in Construction, 19, 5, pp. 539-543, (2010)
  • [3] Biccari C. D., Mangialardi G., Lazoi M., Corallo A., Configuration views from PLM to building lifecycle management, Product Lifecycle Management to Support Industry 4.0, pp. 69-79, (2018)
  • [4] Blessing L. T., Chakrabarti A., DRM: A Design Reseach Methodology, (2009)
  • [5] Boton C., Rivest L., Forgues D., Jupp J., Comparing PLM and BIM from the product structure standpoint, Product Lifecycle Management for Digital Transformation of Industries, pp. 443-453, (2016)
  • [6] Chang S.-H., Lee W.-L., Li R.-K., Manufacturing bill-of-material planning, Production planning & control, 8, 5, pp. 437-450, (1997)
  • [7] Cheng Z., Tang S., Liu H., Lei Z., Digital Technologies in Offsite and Prefabricated Construction: Theories and Applications, Buildings, 13, 1, (2023)
  • [8] All About PLM
  • [9] Davenport T. H., Prusak L., Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know: Harvard Business School, (1998)
  • [10] Eastman C. M., Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., Liston K., BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors: (2. ed.), (2011)
12345