Taking the “leed” in indoor air quality: Does certification result in healthier buildings?

被引:0
作者
Phillips H. [1 ]
Handy R. [1 ]
Sleeth D. [1 ]
Thiese M.S. [1 ]
Schaefer C. [1 ]
Stubbs J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah, 391 Chipeta Way, Suite C, SLC, 84108, UT
来源
Journal of Green Building | 1600年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ); LEED-Certified Buildings; Particulate Matter Concentrations (PM); Sick Building Syndrome (SBS);
D O I
10.3992/jgb.15.3.55
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) has been an area of growing concern with the increasing knowledge of health hazards associated with contaminants, particularly in high occupancy buildings where residents may be exposed to high levels of nuisance dust and other contaminants. Leadership and Energy in Environmental Design (LEED®) certification, which is awarded to buildings that prioritize sustainability and efficient resource use, has been increasingly sought in new construction. As LEED-certified buildings become more commonplace, it is worthwhile to consider whether these new building practices improve IAQ for its occupants. This study compares particulate matter (PM) concentrations in 12 LEED-certified buildings to 12 analogous non-LEED certified buildings on the University of Utah campus. Real-time air sampling was conducted in each building for PM measurements and a Wilcoxon signed rank test was conducted to compare PM levels. A statistically significant difference was found between LEED certification and PM concentrations, with LEED-certified buildings containing, on average, approximately half the PM of their non-LEED counterparts. These findings suggest that LEED certification is worth the financial investment, as it may lead to improved IAQ for residents. However, further research on other contaminants is warranted, including the characterization and comparison of formaldehyde and carbon dioxide levels. © 2020, College Publishing. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 66
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Singh A., Et al., Effects of Green Buildings on Employee Health and Productivity, American Journal of Public Health, 100, 9, pp. 1665-1668, (2010)
  • [2] Heinzerling A., Hsu J., Yip F., Respiratory Health Effects of Ultrafine Particles in Children: a Literature Review, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 227, 1, (2015)
  • [3] Li H., Et al., Particulate Matter Exposure and Stress Hormone Levels, Circulation, 136, 7, pp. 618-627, (2017)
  • [4] Europe W.R.O.f., WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants, (2010)
  • [5] Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM), (2018)
  • [6] Indoor Air Quality in Offices and Other Large Buildings, (2017)
  • [7] Hepner C.M., Boser R.A., Architects’ Perceptions of LEED Indoor Environmental Quality Checklist Items on Employee Productivity, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 2, 3, pp. 193-208, (2006)
  • [8] Joshi S., The sick building syndrome, Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 12, 2, (2008)
  • [9] Apte M.G., Fisk W.J., Daisey J.M., Associations Between Indoor CO2 Concentrations and Sick Building Syndrome Symptoms in U.S. Office Buildings: An Analysis of the 1994–1996 BASE Study Data, Indoor Air, 10, 4, pp. 246-257, (2000)
  • [10] Gyntelberg F., Et al., Dust and the Sick Building Syndrome, Indoor Air, 4, 4, pp. 223-238, (1994)