Ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies relationships and their driving factor analysis based on the Bayesian belief Network: A case study of the Yellow River Basin

被引:9
作者
Shen, Jing [1 ]
Zhao, Mudan [1 ]
Tan, Zhidan [2 ]
Zhu, Linna [1 ]
Guo, Yuanhui [1 ]
Li, Yunfei [1 ]
Wu, Chenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Tourism, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem synergies and trade-offs; Bayesian Belief Network; The Yellow River Basin; Driving forces; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112070
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A systematic understanding of shifts in the temporal and spatial distributions of ecosystem services (ESs) in the Yellow River Basin and the trade-offs and synergies between these services and their driving variables is essential for effective management of the environment and for enhancing human well-being. This study quantitatively assessed the carbon storage (CS), water yield (WY), habitat quality (HQ), and soil retention (SR) from 2000 to 2020, combinded Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) and ESs, determined the crucial elements influencing the supply of ESs via sensitivity analysis, identified synergies and trade-offs between ESs via probabilistic reasoning, and explored the driving processes via scenario analysis. The following are the key findings of this research. (1) Geographically, the Yellow River Basin, SR, CS, and WY exhibited higher levels in southern regions and lower levels in northern regions, whereas HQ showed higher levels in the northwestern region and lower levels in the southeastern region. Both WY and CS showed annual increases in the time series. (2) With respect to trade-offs and synergistic interactions, HQ, WY, and CS had a synergistic connection, whereas SR and HQ, CS, WY had a trade-off connection. (3) According to the BBN sensitivity analysis, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), temperature, precipitation, and land use (LU) were the main variable nodes affecting ESs. (4) The results of the scenario analysis revealed that LU was the primary driver of the four ESs In addition, precipitation and NDVI primarily drove the synergistic and trade-off relationships between HQ, CS, and WY. This study combined BBN and ESs to develop a new method for investigating ES functions and established a solid scientific foundation for ES management and macroeconomic growth planning.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Navigating pluralism: Understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept
    Ainscough, Jacob
    Lentsch, Aster de Vries
    Metzger, Marc
    Rounsevell, Mark
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Delbaere, Ben
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Staes, Jan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 36
  • [2] Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Koch, Evamaria W.
    Silliman, Brian R.
    Hacker, Sally D.
    Wolanski, Eric
    Primavera, Jurgenne
    Granek, Elise F.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Aswani, Shankar
    Cramer, Lori A.
    Stoms, David M.
    Kennedy, Chris J.
    Bael, David
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Perillo, Gerardo M. E.
    Reed, Denise J.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5861) : 321 - 323
  • [3] Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms
    Bekele, EG
    Nicklow, JW
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (10) : W10406 - 1
  • [4] Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Gordon, Line J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) : 1394 - 1404
  • [5] An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia
    Butler, James R. A.
    Wong, Grace Y.
    Metcalfe, Daniel J.
    Honzak, Miroslav
    Pert, Petina L.
    Rao, Nalini
    van Grieken, Martijn E.
    Lawson, Tina
    Bruce, Caroline
    Kroon, Frederieke J.
    Brodie, Jon E.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 180 : 176 - 191
  • [6] [陈万旭 Chen Wanxu], 2022, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V42, P589
  • [7] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [8] Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach
    Dade, Marie C.
    Mitchell, Matthew G. E.
    McAlpine, Clive A.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    [J]. AMBIO, 2019, 48 (10) : 1116 - 1128
  • [9] [戴路炜 Dai Luwei], 2020, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V40, P2863
  • [10] Daily GC, 1998, Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems, V3, DOI [10.2307/3244191, DOI 10.2307/3244191]