Assessing the standard of emergency general surgical (EGS) operation notes in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines

被引:1
作者
Zuberi, Sharukh [1 ]
Mustaq, Yusuf [1 ]
Ijaz, Ali [2 ]
Sundar, Samyukta [3 ]
Mohamedali, Zahra [4 ]
Patel, Krashna [1 ]
Joseph, Janso [1 ]
Gurprashad, Roy [1 ]
机构
[1] Luton & Dunstable Univ Hosp, Clin Gen Surg, Luton, Beds, England
[2] Bradford Royal Infirm, Clin Otolaryngol, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[3] John Radcliffe Hosp, Clin Maxillofacial Surg, Oxford, England
[4] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Clin Gastroenterol, London, England
关键词
Emergency general surgery; operation notes; royal college of surgeons; audit; electronic operation notes; QUALITY; AUDIT;
D O I
10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6194
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Operation notes are important for care in surgical patients. The objectives of this study were to analyze the emergency general surgery (EGS) operation note documentation in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines and to assess the impact of creating awareness of the guidelines and effect of a new proforma. Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 50 EGS operation notes was conducted between December 2019 and March 2020 and compared to RCSEng guidelines. Education was delivered on the importance of documentation in accordance with RCSEng guidelines. A new electronic proforma was introduced. A further 50 EGS operation notes were analysed between August 2020 and December 2020. Results: One hundred operation notes were reviewed, and each given a score out of 19. Our interventions showed significant improvement to the average score (15.64 vs 17.96; p < 0.001). Within the second cycle, there was a statistically significance difference when comparing electronic to handwritten notes (18.55 vs 17.50; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Implementation of the new proforma showed improvement in operation note documentation when compared to the RCSEng standard. Therefore, this study emphasizes the need for surgeons to familiarize themselves with the current guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: the value of a proforma
    Al Hussainy, H
    Ali, F
    Jones, S
    McGregor-Riley, JC
    Sukumar, S
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2004, 35 (11): : 1102 - 1106
  • [2] Introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) improves operation note documentation: the results of a closed loop audit and proposal of a team-based approach to documentation
    Aldoori, Joanna
    Drye, Naomi
    Peter, Mark
    Barrie, Jenifer
    [J]. BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2019, 8 (04)
  • [3] A Closed-Loop Audit for Orthopedic Trauma Operation Notes Comparing Typed Electronic Notes With Handwritten Notes
    Anazor, Fitzgerald
    Sibanda, Vusumuzi
    Abubakar, Aisha
    Ekungba-Adewole, Mutmainah
    Elbardesy, Hany
    Dhinsa, Baljinder S.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [4] Improving the quality of procedure-specific operation reports in orthopaedic surgery
    Barritt, Andrew W.
    Clark, Laura
    Cohen, Adam M. M.
    Hosangadi-Jayedev, Naveen
    Gibb, Paul A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (02) : 159 - 162
  • [5] Bateman ND, 1999, J ROY COLL SURG EDIN, V44, P94
  • [6] Borchert D, 2005, Int J Surg, V8, DOI [10.5580/ee1, DOI 10.5580/EE1]
  • [7] Improving the quality of operation notes: Effect of using proforma, audit and education sessions
    Bozbiyik, Osman
    Makay, Ozer
    Ozdemir, Murat
    Goktepe, Berk
    Ersin, Sinan
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (07) : 755 - 758
  • [8] INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I
    BRENNAN, TA
    LEAPE, LL
    LAIRD, NM
    HEBERT, L
    LOCALIO, AR
    LAWTHERS, AG
    NEWHOUSE, JP
    WEILER, PC
    HIATT, HH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) : 370 - 376
  • [9] Devlin H, 1995, Clin Risk, V1, P97, DOI [10.1177/135626229500100301, DOI 10.1177/135626229500100301]
  • [10] General Medical Council (GMC), Domain 1: Knowledge skills and performance