Comparative analysis of Gasifier-CI engine performance and emissions characteristics using diesel with producer gas derived from coal- briquette-coconut shell-mahua feedstock and its blends

被引:20
作者
Raj, Reetu [1 ]
Tirkey, Jeewan Vachan [1 ]
Jena, Priyaranjan [1 ]
Prajapati, Lawalesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol BHU, Dept Mech Engn, Varanasi 221005, India
关键词
Gasifier-dual fuel engine; Gasification efficiency; Diesel saving; RSM; Performance comparison; POWER-GENERATION; GASIFICATION; BIOMASS; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.130708
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, gasifier-dual fuelled engine (G-DFE) performance was conducted and compared together with gasification of individual feedstock (i.e., mahua wood, coconut shell, sawdust briquette) and their blends with low-grade coal. Additionally, the performance of different sets of feedstock gasification and engine utilization were compared with optimal input and output response using response surface methodology (RSM). The inputs of G-DFE include gasification equivalence ratio (GER) and engine load percentage. The G-DFE performance includes engine brake thermal efficiency (BTE), diesel saving (DS), and CO, CO2, HC, and NOX emissions. Results depict biomass co-gasification blends presented higher engine performance than single feedstock gasification. The (briquette + mahua) producer gas (PG) based dual fuel (DF) engine offers a maximum BTE of 27.6% at input condition of GER 0.12 and 100% load. The maximum DS of 63.44% was obtained for coconut shell G-DFE. Regarding optimum emission, the maximum CO and HC, belong to the setting of GER 0.10 for briquette and (briquette + mahua) G-DFE. The maximum CO2 and NOX belong to the setting of GER 0.10, 100% load for (briquette + mahua), and GER 0.43, 100% load for mahua G-DFE, respectively. Further, the study's experimental results and optimizations can guide G-DFE management for improved operation and reduced environmental footprint.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Comparative study of various biofuel combinations derived from agricultural residues on the performance and emissions of CI engine [J].
Akkoli, K. M. ;
Gangavati, P. B. ;
Banapurmath, N. R. ;
Yaliwal, V. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2020, 13 (02) :140-150
[2]   Sustainable development of renewable energy integrated power sector: Trends, environmental impacts, and recent challenges [J].
Al-Shetwi, Ali Q. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 822
[3]   Experimental investigation of downdraft biomass gasifier fed by sugarcane bagasse and coconut shells [J].
Awais, Muhammad ;
Li, Wei ;
Munir, Anjum ;
Omar, Muhammad Mubashar ;
Ajmal, Muhammad .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2021, 11 (02) :429-444
[4]   Balancing climate mitigation and energy security goals amid converging global energy crises: The role of green investments [J].
Belaid, Fateh ;
Al-Sarihi, Aisha ;
Al-Mestneer, Raed .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 205 :534-542
[5]   Co-gasification of Indian rice husk and Indian coal with high-ash in bubbling fluidized bed gasification reactor [J].
Bharath, M. ;
Raghavan, Vasudevan ;
Prasad, B. V. S. S. S. ;
Chakravarthy, S. R. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 137 :608-615
[6]   Co-gasification of municipal solid waste and biomass in a commercial scale downdraft gasifier [J].
Bhoi, Prakashbhai R. ;
Huhnke, Raymond L. ;
Kumar, Ajay ;
Indrawan, Natarianto ;
Thapa, Sunil .
ENERGY, 2018, 163 :513-518
[7]  
Bhoj S, 2023, Materials Today: Proceedings
[8]  
Chauhan K, 2023, Mater Today Proc.
[9]   Multi-response optimization on the gasification of cocoa pod (Theobroma cacao) husk and its performance in a multi-fuel engine [J].
Chockalingam, Murugan Paradesi ;
Gunasekaran, Arun Prasad ;
Santhappan, Joseph Sekhar .
BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (11) :10311-10326
[10]   A comprehensive review of primary strategies for tar removal in biomass gasification [J].
Cortazar, M. ;
Santamaria, L. ;
Lopez, G. ;
Alvarez, J. ;
Zhang, L. ;
Wang, R. ;
Bi, X. ;
Olazar, M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 276