A review on zero energy buildings – Pros and cons

被引：2
作者：
Wilberforce T. [1 ]
Olabi A.G. [1 ,2 ]
Sayed E.T. [3 ,4 ]
Elsaid K. [5 ]
Maghrabie H.M. [6 ]
Abdelkareem M.A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Mechanical Engineering and Design, Aston University, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston Triangle, Birmingham
[2] Department of Sustainable and Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah
[3] Center for Advanced Materials Research, University of Sharjah, PO Box 27272, Sharjah
[4] Chemical Engineering Department, Minia University, Elminia
[5] Chemical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, TX 77843-3122, College Station, TX
[6] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena
来源：
Energy and Built Environment | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词：
Construction industry; Policies; Renewable energy; Zero energy buildings;
D O I：
10.1016/j.enbenv.2021.06.002
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Enhancing the energy efficiency of structures has been a staple of energy policies. The key goal is to slash electricity usage in order to minimize the footprint of houses. This goal is sought by putting restrictions on the design specifications with respect to the properties of the raw materials and components as well as the exploitation of sustainable sources of energy. These facts for the basis for zero-energy building (ZEB) being established. This novel technology has faced several obstacles impeding its commercialization and future advancement. This investigation therefore holistically explored and evaluated the state of zero energy building and factors impeding their commercialization. The review further proposed some suggestion in terms of technology that can be considered by the sector to augment existing technologies. Similarly, the investigation touched on the effect of occupant's character in zero energy structures. Policies in terms of government subsidies and tax rebates were recommended to encourage more investors into the sector. Finally, the perception of zero energy building being more expensive compared to the traditional structures can equally be curbed via efficient and effective public sensitization. © 2021
引用
收藏
页码：25 / 38
页数：13
相关论文
共 210 条
  • [31] Tang Q., Research on building energy saving management strategy, Doors Windows, 8, (2016)
  • [32] Xing L., Shan B., The international experiences of China's total energy consumption control and its enlightenment, Energy China, 34, 9, pp. 14-16, (2012)
  • [33] Ali K.A., Ahmad M.I., Yusup Y., Issues, impacts, and mitigations of carbon dioxide emissions in the building sector, Sustainability, 12, (2020)
  • [34] Lin Y., Zhong S., Yang W., Hao X., Li C.-Q., Towards zero-energy buildings in china: a systematic literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 276, (2020)
  • [35] Xu W., Yang X., Zhang S., Key issues and solutions for the development of near-zero energy buildings in China, Build. Sci., 34, 12, pp. 165-173, (2018)
  • [36] Panagiotidou M., Fuller R.J., Progress in ZEBs—a review of definitions, policies and construction activity, Energy Policy, 62, pp. 196-206, (2013)
  • [37] Kosai S., Tan C., Quantitative analysis on a zero energy building performance from energy trilemma perspective, Sustain. Cities Soc., 32, pp. 130-141, (2017)
  • [38] Wang N., Phelan P.E., Gonzalez J., Harris C., Henze G.P., Hutchinson R., Langevin J., Lazarus M.A., Nelson B., Pyke C., Ten questions concerning future buildings beyond zero energy and carbon neutrality, Build. Environ., 119, pp. 169-182, (2017)
  • [39] Delivering Energy Savings in Buildings - International Collaboration on Building Energy Code Implementation, (2015)
  • [40] Dean B., Dulac J., Petrichenko K., Graham P., Towards Zero-Emission Efficient and Resilient Buildings Global Status Report 2016, (2016)
12345678910