Dyslexia in higher education - teacher's perspective: scoping review

被引:2
作者
Cernickaja, Karin [1 ]
Sokolova, Lenka [1 ]
机构
[1] Comenius Univ, Inst Appl Psychol, Fac Social & Econ Sci, Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
dyslexia; neurodiversity; higher education; review; inclusion; STUDENTS; EXPERIENCES; DISABILITIES; UNIVERSITY;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1372699
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The experience of dyslexic students is influenced by the beliefs, knowledge, attitudes, and practices of their teachers at all levels of education, including the university. The purpose of this review is to explore the empirical knowledge of dyslexic university students from the point of view of their teachers. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 12 studies (out of the 771 retrieved from 5 main relevant databases) met the inclusion criteria. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the included studies. Three main themes were identified: dyslexia = gray area; "inclusive university"; and practical training is necessary. In conclusion, awareness of dyslexia among university teachers is sufficient, and their attitudes toward dyslexic students are mostly positive, while expressing some concerns, which would deserve closer examination directly in practice. Higher education teachers would appreciate practical training to acquire skills to work with students with dyslexia. These trainings have the potential to increase the self-efficacy of teachers and thus overall support the well-being not only of teachers but also of dyslexic students. This study advances the existing literature on dyslexia in higher education by adding the point of view of higher education teachers. Based on the results of this study, it is clear that universities should provide more support to their teaching staff, including guidance and practical training, so that their courses could become inclusive and welcoming for all students (including students with dyslexia).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion: Inclusive Language Guidelines
[2]   Language matters! The long-standing debate between identity-first language and person first language [J].
Best, Krista L. ;
Mortenson, W. Ben ;
Lauziere-Fitzgerald, Zach ;
Smith, Emma M. .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 34 (02) :127-128
[3]   Understanding the Comorbidity Between Dyslexia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [J].
Boada, Richard ;
Willcutt, Erik G. ;
Pennington, Bruce F. .
TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 2012, 32 (03) :264-284
[4]  
Boileau E, 2017, ADV MED EDUC PRACT, V8, P89, DOI 10.2147/AMEP.S123410
[5]   Does Language Matter? Identity-First Versus Person-First Language Use in Autism Research: A Response to Vivanti [J].
Botha, Monique ;
Hanlon, Jacqueline ;
Williams, Gemma Louise .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2023, 53 (02) :870-878
[6]   Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) :589-597
[7]  
Brunswick N., 2012, Supporting dyslexic adults in higher education and the workplace
[8]   College Instructors' Theories of Intelligence and Awareness of Student Dyslexia as Related to the Feedback Provided for the Student's Writing Assignment [J].
Chang, Tzu-Fen ;
Lee, Gabrielle T. ;
Bruce, Alyssia T. ;
Powell, Denise N. ;
Yang, Li-hsuan .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2024, 127 (01) :276-298
[9]   Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis [J].
Clouder, Lynn ;
Karakus, Mehmet ;
Cinotti, Alessia ;
Ferreyra, Maria Virginia ;
Fierros, Genoveva Amador ;
Rojo, Patricia .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 80 (04) :757-778
[10]  
Doikou-Avlidou M, 2015, INT J SPEC EDUC, V30, P132