Government subsidies and corporate environmental, social and governance performance: Evidence from companies of China

被引:5
作者
Peng, Pei [1 ]
Sun, Mengzi [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Business, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF ECONOMICS | 2024年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
ESG; government subsidy; green innovation; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; SIGNAL; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1002/ise3.79
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance is crucial for companies to attain sustainable development, which is a key reference for assessing the value and growth potential of a company. Government subsidies can provide incentives for companies to prioritize environmental preservation, meet their social duties, and improve their governance performance. This paper empirically examines the effects and mechanisms of government subsidies on corporate ESG performance, using an Ologit multiple ordered regression model based on data from Chinese listed companies. We find that not only do total government subsidies significantly improve firms' ESG performance, but both environmental and non-environmental subsidies also have the similar effect, albeit with different impact mechanisms. The analysis of the mechanism suggests that government subsidies can enhance corporate ESG performance by promoting green innovation, alleviating financing constraints, increasing charitable donations, and attracting social attention. This paper holds significant practical value as it presents empirical findings as a basis for reforming China's subsidy policies, showcasing the actual impact of diverse subsidy policies and the heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 405
页数:32
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Environmental impacts of coal subsidies in Turkey: A general equilibrium analysis [J].
Acar, Sevil ;
Yeldan, A. Erinc .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 90 :1-15
[2]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[3]   Green efficiency and environmental subsidy: Evidence from thermal power firms in China [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Hua, Congcong ;
Jiao, Jianling ;
Yang, Min ;
Li, Fangyi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 :49-61
[4]   Green electricity investments: Environmental target and the optimal subsidy [J].
Bigerna, Simona ;
Wen, Xingang ;
Hagspiel, Verena ;
Kort, Peter M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 279 (02) :635-644
[5]   Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? [J].
Cai, Ye ;
Pan, Carrie H. ;
Statman, Meir .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 41 :591-609
[6]   Exploring the nexus between ESG disclosure and corporate sustainable growth: Moderating role of media attention [J].
Chai, Shanglei ;
Cao, Mengjun ;
Li, Qiang ;
Ji, Qiang ;
Liu, Zuankuo .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
[7]  
Chen X. S., 2021, FINANCE TRADE EC, V32, P83, DOI [https://doi.org/10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2021.01.007, DOI 10.19337/J.CNKI.34-1093/F.2021.01.007]
[8]   How do Small and Medium Enterprises Go "Green"? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the US Wine Industry [J].
Cordano, Mark ;
Marshall, R. Scott ;
Silverman, Murray .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 92 (03) :463-478
[9]   The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany [J].
Czarnitzki, Dirk ;
Ebersberger, Bernd ;
Fier, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (07) :1347-1366
[10]   The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance [J].
de Villiers, Charl ;
Naiker, Vic ;
van Staden, Chris J. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (06) :1636-1663