Balanced opioid-free anesthesia with lidocaine and esketamine versus balanced anesthesia with sufentanil for gynecological endoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

被引:8
作者
Hu, Yang [1 ]
Zhang, Qing-yun [1 ]
Qin, Guan-chao [1 ]
Zhu, Guo-hong [1 ]
Long, Xiang [1 ]
Xu, Jin-fei [1 ]
Gong, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Three Gorges Univ & Yichang Cent Peoples Hos, Inst Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Yichang 443000, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REMIFENTANIL; PROPOFOL; NAUSEA;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-62824-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this randomized controlled trial, 74 patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I/II) were enrolled and randomly divided into two study groups: (i) Group C (control), received sufentanil (0.3 mu g/kg) and saline, followed by sufentanil (0.1 mu g/kg center dot h) and saline; and (ii) Group F (OFA), received esketamine (0.15 mg/kg) and lidocaine (2 mg/kg), followed by esketamine (0.1 mg/kg center dot h) and lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg center dot h). The primary outcome was the 48-h time-weighted average (TWA) of postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, adverse effects, and postoperative sedation score, pain scores at different time points, analgesic consumption at 48 h, and gastrointestinal functional recovery. The 48-h TWAs of pain scores were 1.32 (0.78) (95% CI 1.06-1.58) and 1.09 (0.70) (95% CI 0.87-1.33) for Groups F and C, respectively. The estimated difference between Groups F and C was - 0.23 (95% CI - 0.58 - 0.12; P = 0.195). No differences were found in any of the secondary outcomes and no severe adverse effects were observed in either group. Balanced OFA with lidocaine and esketamine achieved similar effects to balanced anesthesia with sufentanil in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, without severe adverse effects.Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2300067951, www.chictr.org.cn 01 February, 2023.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Accuracy in equianalgesic dosing: Conversion dilemmas [J].
Anderson, R ;
Saiers, JH ;
Abram, S ;
Schlicht, C .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (05) :397-406
[2]   A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Läärä, E ;
Koivuranta, M ;
Greim, CA ;
Roewer, N .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) :693-700
[3]   Opioid-free postoperative analgesia: Is it feasible? [J].
Baboli, Koemil Mirzaei ;
Liu, Henry ;
Poggio, Juan Lucas .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2020, 57 (07)
[4]   Lidocaine: A Local Anesthetic, Its Adverse Effects and Management [J].
Bahar, Entaz ;
Yoon, Hyonok .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (08)
[5]  
Bakan M, 2015, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V65, P191, DOI [10.1016/j.bjan.2014.05.006, 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.05.001]
[6]   Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine [J].
Beaussier, Marc ;
Delbos, Alain ;
Maurice-Szamburski, Axel ;
Ecoffey, Claude ;
Mercadal, Luc .
DRUGS, 2018, 78 (12) :1229-1246
[7]   Balanced Opioid-free Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine versus Balanced Anesthesia with Remifentanil for Major or Intermediate Noncardiac Surgery: The Postoperative and Opioid-free Anesthesia (POFA) Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Beloeil, Helene ;
Garot, Matthias ;
Lebuffe, Gilles ;
Gerbaud, Alexandre ;
Bila, Julien ;
Cuvillon, Philippe ;
Dubout, Elisabeth ;
Oger, Sebastien ;
Nadaud, Julien ;
Becret, Antoine ;
Coullier, Nicolas ;
Lecoeur, Sylvain ;
Fayon, Julie ;
Godet, Thomas ;
Mazerolles, Michel ;
Atallah, Fouad ;
Sigaut, Stephanie ;
Choinier, Pierre-Marie ;
Asehnoune, Karim ;
Roquilly, Antoine ;
Chanques, Gerald ;
Esvan, Maxime ;
Futier, Emmanuel ;
Laviolle, Bruno .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 134 (04) :541-551
[8]   Opioid-free anesthesia [J].
Beloeil, Helene .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH-CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (03) :353-360
[9]  
Benyamin R, 2008, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V11, pS105
[10]  
Carcamo-Cavazos Valeria, 2022, Adv Anesth, V40, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.aan.2022.07.003