Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard dietary care for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (The BCC Study): a randomised, controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Ewers, Bettina [1 ]
Blond, Martin B. [1 ]
Bruun, Jens M. [2 ,3 ]
Vilsboll, Tina [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Steno Diabet Ctr Copenhagen, Dept Clin & Translat Res, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Steno Diabet Ctr Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Aarhus, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
NUTRITION & DIABETES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
NUTRITION THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; INDIVIDUALS; VALIDATION; LITERACY; NUMERACY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1038/s41387-024-00307-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical guidelines recommend basic carbohydrate counting (BCC), or similar methods to improve carbohydrate estimation skills and to strive for higher consistency in carbohydrate intake potentially improving glycaemic control. However, evidence for this approach in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is limited. Objective: To examine the efficacy of a structured education program in BCC as add-on to standard dietary care on glycaemic control in individuals with T2D. Methods: The BCC Study was a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial. Individuals with T2D aged 18-75 years with glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 53-97 mmol/mol (7.0-11.0%) were randomly assigned (1:1) to BCC or standard dietary care. The primary outcomes were differences in changes in HbA1c or glycaemic variability (calculated as mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions [MAGE]) between groups after six months of intervention. Results: Between September 2018 and July 2021, 48 participants were randomly assigned, 23 to BCC and 25 to standard dietary care. Seven participants did not receive the allocated intervention. From a baseline-adjusted mean of 65 mmol/mol (95% CI 62-68 [8.1%, 7.8-8.4]), HbA1c changed by -5 mmol/mol (-8 to -1 [-0.5%, -0.7 to -0.1]) in BCC and -3 mmol/mol (-7 to 1 [-0.3%, -0.6 to 0.1]) in standard care with an estimated treatment effect of -2 mmol/mol (-7 to 4 [-0.2%, -0.6 to 0.4]); p = 0.554. From a baseline-adjusted mean of 4.2 mmol/l (3.7 to 4.8), MAGE changed by -16% (-33 to 5) in BCC and by -3% (-21 to 20) in standard care with an estimated treatment effect of -14% (-36 to 16); p = 0.319. Only median carbohydrate estimation error in favour of BCC (estimated treatment difference -55% (-70 to -32); p < 0.001) remained significant after multiple testing adjustment. Conclusions: No glycaemic effects were found but incorporating BCC as a supplementary component to standard dietary care led to improved skills in estimating carbohydrate intake among individuals with T2D.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of intermittent empagliflozin supplementation on dietary self-management and glycaemic control in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: A 24-week randomized controlled trial
    Yoshikawa, Fukumi
    Kumashiro, Naoki
    Shigiyama, Fumika
    Uchino, Hiroshi
    Ando, Yasuyo
    Yoshino, Hiroshi
    Miyagi, Masahiko
    Ikehara, Kayoko
    Hirose, Takahisa
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (02) : 303 - 311
  • [42] INTEGRA study protocol: primary care intervention in type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycaemic control
    Mollo, Angels
    Berenguera, Anna
    Rubinat, Esther
    Vlacho, Bogdan
    Mata, Manel
    Franch, Josep
    Bolibar, Bonaventura
    Mauricio, Didac
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [43] The effect of a mobile application on the foot care of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled study
    Dincer, Berna
    Bahcecik, Nefise
    HEALTH EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2021, 80 (04) : 425 - 437
  • [44] The Happy Life Club™ study protocol: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a type 2 diabetes health coach intervention
    Browning, Colette
    Chapman, Anna
    Cowlishaw, Sean
    Li, Zhixin
    Thomas, Shane A.
    Yang, Hui
    Zhang, Tuohong
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [45] Does working memory training improve dietary self-care in type 2 diabetes mellitus? Results of a double blind randomised controlled trial
    Whitelock, Victoria
    Nouwen, Arie
    Houben, Katrijn
    van den Akker, Olga
    Rosenthal, Miranda
    Higgs, Suzanne
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 143 : 204 - 214
  • [46] Randomised controlled trial of a web-based low carbohydrate diet intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: the T2Diet study protocol
    Dening, Jedha
    George, Elena S.
    Ball, Kylie
    Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
    Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [47] Dietary quality and carotid intima media thickness in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
    Petersen, K. S.
    Keogh, J. B.
    Lister, N. B.
    Clifton, P. M.
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 28 (08) : 830 - 838
  • [48] Effects of individualized dietary advice compared with conventional dietary advice for adults with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial
    Omura, Yuka
    Murakami, Kentaro
    Matoba, Keiichiro
    Nishimura, Rimei
    Sasaki, Satoshi
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 32 (04) : 1035 - 1044
  • [49] Effects of a 6-month, low-carbohydrate diet on glycaemic control, body composition, and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: An open-label randomized controlled trial
    Gram-Kampmann, Eva M.
    Hansen, Camilla D.
    Hugger, Mie B.
    Jensen, Jane M.
    Brond, Jan C.
    Hermann, Anne Pernille
    Krag, Aleksander
    Olsen, Michael H.
    Beck-Nielsen, Henning
    Hojlund, Kurt
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2022, 24 (04) : 693 - 703
  • [50] Day and night glycaemic control with a bionic pancreas versus conventional insulin pump therapy in preadolescent children with type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
    Russell, Steven J.
    Hillard, Mallory A.
    Balliro, Courtney
    Magyar, Kendra L.
    Selagamsetty, Rajendranath
    Sinha, Manasi
    Grennan, Kerry
    Mondesir, Debbie
    Ehklaspour, Laya
    Zheng, Hui
    Damiano, Edward R.
    El-Khatib, Firas H.
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 4 (03) : 233 - 243