Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard dietary care for glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (The BCC Study): a randomised, controlled trial

被引:1
|
作者
Ewers, Bettina [1 ]
Blond, Martin B. [1 ]
Bruun, Jens M. [2 ,3 ]
Vilsboll, Tina [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Steno Diabet Ctr Copenhagen, Dept Clin & Translat Res, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Steno Diabet Ctr Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Univ Aarhus, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
NUTRITION & DIABETES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
NUTRITION THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; INDIVIDUALS; VALIDATION; LITERACY; NUMERACY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1038/s41387-024-00307-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical guidelines recommend basic carbohydrate counting (BCC), or similar methods to improve carbohydrate estimation skills and to strive for higher consistency in carbohydrate intake potentially improving glycaemic control. However, evidence for this approach in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is limited. Objective: To examine the efficacy of a structured education program in BCC as add-on to standard dietary care on glycaemic control in individuals with T2D. Methods: The BCC Study was a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial. Individuals with T2D aged 18-75 years with glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 53-97 mmol/mol (7.0-11.0%) were randomly assigned (1:1) to BCC or standard dietary care. The primary outcomes were differences in changes in HbA1c or glycaemic variability (calculated as mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions [MAGE]) between groups after six months of intervention. Results: Between September 2018 and July 2021, 48 participants were randomly assigned, 23 to BCC and 25 to standard dietary care. Seven participants did not receive the allocated intervention. From a baseline-adjusted mean of 65 mmol/mol (95% CI 62-68 [8.1%, 7.8-8.4]), HbA1c changed by -5 mmol/mol (-8 to -1 [-0.5%, -0.7 to -0.1]) in BCC and -3 mmol/mol (-7 to 1 [-0.3%, -0.6 to 0.1]) in standard care with an estimated treatment effect of -2 mmol/mol (-7 to 4 [-0.2%, -0.6 to 0.4]); p = 0.554. From a baseline-adjusted mean of 4.2 mmol/l (3.7 to 4.8), MAGE changed by -16% (-33 to 5) in BCC and by -3% (-21 to 20) in standard care with an estimated treatment effect of -14% (-36 to 16); p = 0.319. Only median carbohydrate estimation error in favour of BCC (estimated treatment difference -55% (-70 to -32); p < 0.001) remained significant after multiple testing adjustment. Conclusions: No glycaemic effects were found but incorporating BCC as a supplementary component to standard dietary care led to improved skills in estimating carbohydrate intake among individuals with T2D.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of basic carbohydrate counting versus standard outpatient nutritional education (The BCC Study): study protocol for a randomised, parallel open-label, intervention study focusing on HbA1c and glucose variability in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Ewers, Bettina
    Bruun, Jens Meldgaard
    Vilsboll, Tina
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [2] Dietary carbohydrate restriction augments weight loss-induced improvements in glycaemic control and liver fat in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
    Thomsen, Mads N.
    Skytte, Mads J.
    Samkani, Amirsalar
    Carl, Martin H.
    Weber, Philip
    Astrup, Arne
    Chabanova, Elizaveta
    Fenger, Mogens
    Frystyk, Jan
    Hartmann, Bolette
    Holst, Jens J.
    Larsen, Thomas M.
    Madsbad, Sten
    Magkos, Faidon
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    Haugaard, Steen B.
    Krarup, Thure
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2022, 65 (03) : 506 - 517
  • [3] Improving glycaemic control self-efficacy and glycaemic control behaviour in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: randomised controlled trial
    Shi, Qifang
    Ostwald, Sharon K.
    Wang, Shaopeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 (3-4) : 398 - 404
  • [4] Impact of pharmacist-led care on glycaemic control of patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial in Nigeria
    David, Emmanuel A.
    Soremekun, Rebecca O.
    Abah, Isaac O.
    Aderemi-Williams, Roseline, I
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2021, 19 (03):
  • [5] Preventing glycaemic relapse in recently controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a randomised controlled trial
    Huizinga, M. M.
    Gebretsadik, T.
    Ulen, C. Garcia
    Shintani, A. K.
    Michon, S. R.
    Shackleford, L. O.
    Wolff, K. L.
    Brown, A. W.
    Rothman, R. L.
    Elasy, T. A.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2010, 53 (05) : 832 - 839
  • [6] Effects of the Norfolk diabetes prevention lifestyle intervention (NDPS) on glycaemic control in screen-detected type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial
    Sampson, Michael
    Clark, Allan
    Bachmann, Max
    Garner, Nikki
    Irvine, Lisa
    Howe, Amanda
    Greaves, Colin
    Auckland, Sara
    Smith, Jane
    Turner, Jeremy
    Rea, Dave
    Rayman, Gerry
    Dhatariya, Ketan
    John, W. Garry
    Barton, Garry
    Usher, Rebecca
    Ferns, Clare
    Pascale, Melanie
    BMC MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [7] Adjunctive vitamin A and D for the glycaemic control in patients with concurrent type 2 diabetes and tuberculosis: a randomised controlled trial
    Xiong, Ke
    Wang, Jinyu
    Ma, Aiguo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2022, 127 (04) : 556 - 562
  • [8] Basic carbohydrate counting and glycemia in young people with type 1 diabetes in India: A randomized controlled trial
    Tandon, Ambica
    Bhowmik, Eshita
    Ali, Zebish
    Tripathi, Sarita
    Ajitha, B. K.
    Chen, Yanjun
    Dabadghao, Preeti
    Sudhanshu, Siddhnath
    Bhatia, Vijayalakshmi
    NUTRITION, 2024, 119
  • [9] Effect of yoga on reducing glycaemic variability in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial
    Vijayakumar, Venugopal
    Mavathur, Ramesh
    Kannan, Subramanian
    Sharma, Manjunath N. K.
    Raguram, Nagarathna
    Kuppusamy, Maheshkumar
    DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2023, 49 (04)
  • [10] Dietary carbohydrate intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetes control: a cross-sectional study
    Al-Mssallem, Muneera Q.
    Al-Qarni, Ali A.
    Al-Jamaan, Mohammed
    FOOD & NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2020, 64