Methods and Applications of Norwegian Model for Science and Technology Evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Liu Q. [1 ]
Chen Y. [1 ]
Zhang Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] (Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China) (Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词
Bibliometric; Norwegian Model; Publication Points; Research Funding;
D O I
10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.1222
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
[Objective] This paper provides a comprehensive introduction to the Norwegian Model, aiming to promote the development of science and technology evaluation in China. [Methods] With case studies, this paper first discussed the implementation of the Norwegian Model, and the successful stories from regions outside of Norway. Then we explored the application of the Norwegian Model at various levels and subjects. Finally, we compared the Norwegian Model with two classic bibliometric measures. [Results] Six European countries used the Norwegian Model, a performance-based research funding system (PRFS), to promote their scientific publications. [Limitations] The Norwegian Model and its applications have been evolving, therefore, we are not able to discuss their future trends. [Conclusions] The Norwegian Model has some value in science and technology evaluation. More research is needed to explore its applications in China. © 2019 The authors.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 50
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Sivertsen G., A Bibliometric Model for Performance Based Budgeting of Research Institutions, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, pp. 133-135, (2006)
  • [2] Sivertsen G., Experiences with a Bibliometric Model for Performance Based Funding of Research Institutions, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, pp. 126-128, (2008)
  • [3] Schneider J W., An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway, European Political Science, 8, 3, pp. 364-378, (2009)
  • [4] Sivertsen G., Den Norske Modellen, Forskningspolitikk, 1, pp. 14-15, (2008)
  • [5] Sivertsen G., A Performance Indicator Based on Complete Data for the Scientific Publication Output at Research Institutions, ISSI Newsletter, 6, 1, pp. 22-28, (2010)
  • [6] Aagaard K, Bloch C W, Schneider J W, Et al., Evaluation of the Norwegian Publication Indicator, (2014)
  • [7] Aagaard K., How Incentives Trickle Down: Local Use of a National Bibliometric Indicator System, Science & Public Policy, 42, 5, pp. 725-737, (2015)
  • [8] Aagaard K, Bloch C W, Schneider J W., Impacts of Performance-Based Research Funding Systems: The Case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator, Research Evaluation, 24, 2, pp. 106-117, (2015)
  • [9] Bloch C W, Schneider J W., Performance-Based Funding Models and Researcher Behavior: An Analysis of the Influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the Individual Level, Research Evaluation, 25, 4, pp. 371-382, (2016)
  • [10] Piro F N, Aksnes D W, Rorstad K., A Macro Analysis of Productivity Differences Across Fields: Challenges in the Measurement of Scientific Publishing, Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 64, 2, pp. 307-320, (2013)