The Influence of Implant Number on Stress Distribution in the Anterior Region of Mandible Reconstructed with Fibula Bone Graft: A Finite Element Analysis

被引:2
作者
Latifi, Fatemeh [1 ]
Tabrizi, Reza [1 ]
Kordkheili, Mohammadreza Hosseini [2 ]
Shahbazi, Soheil [3 ]
Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira [4 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dent Sch, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tehran Azad Univ Med Sci, Dept Prosthodont, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Dent Sci, Dent Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[4] AT Still Univ, Missouri Sch Dent & Oral Hlth, 1500 Pk Ave, St Louis, MO 63104 USA
关键词
Finite element analysis; Dental implants; Mandible; Mechanical stress; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-024-02162-z
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to compare the stress distribution of three or four implants in the anterior region of the mandible that was grafted with a free vascularized fibula flap.MethodsTwo three-dimensional finite element models were designed based on cone-beam computed tomography of a patient whose anterior region of the mandible was restored with a free vascularized fibula flap. In both three- (G1) and four-implant (G2) models, the fixtures were connected with a fixed suprastructure. Occlusal loads were simulated using 300N.cm vertical and 50 N cm oblique forces. Implant micromotion and von Mises stress (VMS) distribution were measured. Inter-model comparisons were performed.ResultsRegarding vertical forces for G1 and G2, the supporting bone volume at maximum VMS was 2.44 mm3 and 3.04 mm3; the fixture volume undergoing maximum VMS was 160 mm3 and 175 mm3. For oblique forces, in the G1 and G2, respectively, the maximum VMS resulted in 7.09 mm3 and 7.73 mm3, and the fixture volume was 7.23 mm3 and 1.56 mm3. In G1, the most distal and middle implants showed the highest and lowest displacement; whereas in G2, the most distal implant displaced under vertical forces, showing the least micromotion under oblique loads. The inter-model comparison showed G2 had lower micromotion on average.ConclusionEmploying the three-implant concept in rehabilitating the anterior region of a fibula-reconstructed mandible resulted in less VMS concentration under vertical and oblique forces; however, using four implants would be better for minimizing the fixture displacement. It is suggested new studies compare new scenarios matching different types of bone grafts and dental implants placed in the mandible and maxilla, trying to keep the heterogeneous complexity of the biomaterials to have better mimics and reality, increasing the reliability of the study.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Investigating the impact of diameters and thread designs on the Biomechanics of short implants placed in D4 bone: a 3D finite element analysis [J].
Alqahtani, Ali Robaian ;
Desai, Shrikar R. ;
Patel, Jignesh R. ;
Alqhtani, Nasser Raqe ;
Alqahtani, Abdullah Saad ;
Heboyan, Artak ;
Fernandes, Gustavo V. O. ;
Mustafa, Mohammed ;
Karobari, Mohamed Isaqali .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
[2]   Zirconia Implants and Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies [J].
Borges, Higor ;
Maia Correia, Andre Ricardo ;
Castilho, Rogerio Moraes ;
de Oliveira Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (04) :707-720
[3]   Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible [J].
Cepic, Lana Zupancic ;
Frank, Martin ;
Reisinger, Andreas ;
Pahr, Dieter ;
Zechner, Werner ;
Schedle, Andreas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
[4]   Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process [J].
Chang, Yuanhan ;
Tambe, Abhijit Anil ;
Maeda, Yoshinobu ;
Wada, Masahiro ;
Gonda, Tomoya .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 4
[5]   Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis [J].
Chiapasco, M ;
Biglioli, F ;
Autelitano, L ;
Romeo, E ;
Brusati, R .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (02) :220-228
[6]   Comparative finite element analysis of mandibular posterior single zirconia and titanium implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis [J].
Choi, Sung-Min ;
Choi, Hyunsuk ;
Lee, Du-Hyeong ;
Hong, Min-Ho .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 13 (06) :396-407
[7]   Three-Dimensional FEA Analysis of the Stress Distribution on Titanium and Graphene Frameworks Supported by 3 or 6-Implant Models [J].
Desai, Shrikar R. ;
Koulgikar, Kiran Deepak ;
Alqhtani, Nasser Raqe ;
Alqahtani, Ali Robaian ;
Alqahtani, Abdullah Saad ;
Alenazi, Adel ;
Heboyan, Artak ;
Fernandes, Gustavo V. O. ;
Mustafa, Mohammed .
BIOMIMETICS, 2023, 8 (01)
[8]   Impact of implant diameter and length on stress distribution in osseointegrated implants: A 3D FEA study [J].
Eazhil, R. ;
Swaminathan, Siva Vadivel ;
Gunaseelan, Madhan ;
Kannan, G. Vijay ;
Alagesan, Chandrapandian .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2016, 6 (06) :590-596
[9]  
Farwell D G, 2000, Facial Plast Surg, V16, P115, DOI 10.1055/s-2000-12573
[10]   Comparative analysis between extra-short implants (≤6 mm) and 6 mm-longer implants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial [J].
Fernandes, G. V. O. ;
Costa, B. M. G. N. ;
Trindade, H. F. ;
Castilho, R. M. ;
Fernandes, J. C. H. .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 67 (03) :194-211