共 9 条
Differences in access to privacy information can partly explain digital inequalities in privacy literacy and self-efficacy
被引:2
|作者:
Meier, Yannic
[1
]
Kraemer, Nicole C.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Social Psychol Media & Commun, Forsthausweg 2, D-47057 Duisburg, Germany
[2] Res Ctr Trustworthy Data Sci & Secur, Dortmund, Germany
关键词:
Digital inequalities;
privacy literacy;
privacy self-efficacy;
online privacy management;
Bayesian inference;
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS;
HEALTH;
WELL;
FIT;
AGE;
D O I:
10.1080/0144929X.2024.2349183
中图分类号:
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号:
0812 ;
摘要:
Users of digital technologies are still held legally responsible for managing their personal data. However, not all users have the same opportunities for privacy management as researchers find systematic sociodemographic differences in, for example, users' privacy literacy and self-efficacy - two important predictors of privacy management. The present study argues that one reason for such digital inequalities is how easily people have access to privacy information in their everyday lives (e.g. through their profession or social contacts). Analysing data of a representative sample of German internet users (N = 3978) by means of a Bayesian structural equation model, we find that men and more educated persons report easier access to privacy information which, in turn, positively relates to both privacy literacy and self-efficacy. Older persons feel less confident about privacy protection while men and more highly educated persons have higher privacy literacy levels. In conclusion, the present study reveals that casual access to privacy information can be important in learning and being confident about privacy management, but it cannot fully explain digital inequalities in online privacy self-efficacy and literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1198
页数:16
相关论文