The impact of social comparison on self-deception: An event-related potentials study

被引:1
作者
Yang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Zhong, Bowei [5 ,6 ]
Zhang, Wenjie [2 ,4 ]
Fan, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Normal Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, 36 Lu Shan Rd, Changsha 410081, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Normal Univ, Hunan Key Lab Cognit & Human Behav, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Normal Univ, Inst Interdisciplinary Studies, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Normal Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Dept Early Childhood Educ, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Social comparison; Comparison gap; Self-deception; Self-protection; Event-related potential; RESPONSE CONFLICT; EMOTIONAL WORDS; BRAIN; P300; ERP; COMPONENT; EEG; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.3758/s13415-024-01203-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Self-deception refers to an individual holding inflated beliefs about their abilities, and it plays a crucial role in human behavior and decision-making. The present study employed event-related potentials (ERPs) technique to explore the neural responses to the impacts of social comparison direction and comparison gap on self-deceptive behavior. They were instructed to predict their performance in the forward-looking paradigm. Behavioral responses and neural reactions during the decision-making process were documented. The behavioral results indicated that, in contrast to the downward comparison condition, participants engaged in upward comparison exhibited more occurrences of self-deception. However, within the context of upward comparison, participants demonstrated a higher frequency of self-deception in the large gap condition compared with the small gap condition. The ERP results showed that induced self-deception under conditions with a large comparative gap between participants and their paired counterparts stimulated larger P300 and smaller N400 amplitude than under conditions with a small gap. However, when participants were in the upward comparison situation, the late positive potential (LPP) amplitude induced by self-deception behavior in the condition of a large comparison gap between participants and paired opponents was larger than that in the condition of a small comparison gap. These results indicated that individuals in the large gap group feel strong unfairness and negative emotions. More importantly, the self-deception induced by the large gap group in the upward comparison situation used fewer cognitive resources than the small gap condition, whereas the individuals in the downward comparison situation did not show the difference in cognitive resources.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 947
页数:17
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do
    Alicke, Mark D.
    Sedikides, Constantine
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 1 - 48
  • [2] Social comparison theory and deception in the interpersonal exchange of consumption information
    Argo, Jennifer J.
    White, Katherine
    Dahl, Darren W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2006, 33 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [3] Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception
    Babino, Andres
    Makse, Hernan A.
    DiTella, Rafael
    Sigman, Mariano
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (35) : 8728 - 8733
  • [4] Freudian defense mechanisms and empirical findings in modern social psychology: Reaction formation, projection, displacement, undoing, isolation, sublimation, and denial
    Baumeister, RF
    Dale, K
    Sommer, KL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1998, 66 (06) : 1081 - 1124
  • [5] Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity
    Bellebaum, Christian
    Daum, Irene
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 27 (07) : 1823 - 1835
  • [6] Self-confidence and personal motivation
    Bénabou, R
    Tirole, J
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (03) : 871 - 915
  • [7] Blanton H., 2001, Group Processes Intergroup Relations, V4, P126, DOI DOI 10.1177/1368430201004002004
  • [8] Knowing when to trust others: An ERP study of decision making after receiving information from unknown people
    Boudreau, Cheryl
    McCubbins, Mathew D.
    Coulson, Seana
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 4 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [9] IF ATTITUDES AFFECT HOW STIMULI ARE PROCESSED, SHOULD THEY NOT AFFECT THE EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL
    CACIOPPO, JT
    CRITES, SL
    BERNTSON, GG
    COLES, MGH
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [10] Campbell W.K., 1999, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V3, P23, DOI DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23