Comparison of WAIC and posterior predictive approaches for N-mixture models

被引:0
|
作者
Gaya, Heather E. [1 ]
Ketz, Alison C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, Wisconsin Cooperat Res Unit, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Bayesian; eBird; Model selection; N-mixture; Posterior-predictive loss; WAIC; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-66643-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Hierarchical models are common for ecological analysis, but determining appropriate model selection methods remains an ongoing challenge. To confront this challenge, a suitable method is needed to evaluate and compare available candidate models. We compared performance of conditional WAIC, a joint-likelihood approach to WAIC (WAICj), and posterior-predictive loss for selecting between candidate N-mixture models. We tested these model selection criteria on simulated single-season N-mixture models, simulated multi-season N-mixture models with temporal auto-correlation, and three case studies of single-season N-mixture models based on eBird data. WAICj proved more accurate than the standard conditional formulation or posterior-predictive loss, even when models were temporally correlated, suggesting WAICj is a robust alternative to model selection for N-mixture models.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A review of N-mixture models
    Madsen, Lisa
    Royle, J. Andrew
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [2] On the robustness of N-mixture models
    Link, William A.
    Schofield, Matthew R.
    Barker, Richard J.
    Sauer, John R.
    ECOLOGY, 2018, 99 (07) : 1547 - 1551
  • [3] Computational Aspects of N-Mixture Models
    Dennis, Emily B.
    Morgan, Byron J. T.
    Ridout, Martin S.
    BIOMETRICS, 2015, 71 (01) : 237 - 246
  • [4] Multinomial N-mixture models for removal sampling
    Haines, Linda M.
    BIOMETRICS, 2020, 76 (02) : 540 - 548
  • [5] WAIC and WBIC for mixture models
    Watanabe S.
    Behaviormetrika, 2021, 48 (1) : 5 - 21
  • [6] Maximum Likelihood Estimation for N-Mixture Models
    Haines, Linda M.
    BIOMETRICS, 2016, 72 (04) : 1235 - 1245
  • [7] Spatially explicit dynamic N-mixture models
    Zhao, Qing
    Royle, J. Andrew
    Boomer, G. Scott
    POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2017, 59 (04) : 293 - 300
  • [8] On the reliability of N-mixture models for count data
    Barker, Richard J.
    Schofield, Matthew R.
    Link, William A.
    Sauer, John R.
    BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (01) : 369 - 377
  • [9] Fitting N-mixture models to count data with unmodeled heterogeneity: Bias, diagnostics, and alternative approaches
    Duarte, Adam
    Adams, Michael J.
    Peterson, James T.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2018, 374 : 51 - 59
  • [10] Spatial dynamic N-mixture models with interspecific interactions
    Zhao, Qing
    Fuller, Angela K.
    Royle, Jeffrey Andrew
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 13 (10): : 2209 - 2221