Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in early third trimester

被引:3
作者
Dagklis, T. [1 ,6 ]
Papastefanou, I. [2 ,3 ]
Tsakiridis, I. [1 ]
Sotiriadis, A. [4 ]
Makrydimas, G. [5 ]
Athanasiadis, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 3, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Kings Coll Hosp London, Fetal Med Res Inst, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth, London, England
[4] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 2, Thessaloniki, Greece
[5] Ioannina Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ioannina, Greece
[6] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hippokrate Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 3, Sch Med,Fac Hlth Sci, 49 Konstantinoupoleos St, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
关键词
detection rate; external validation; fetal growth restriction; Fetal Medicine Foundation; FMF; screening; small-for-gestational age; GROWTH RESTRICTION; BIRTH-WEIGHT; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/uog.27498
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the new 36-week Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model for the prediction of small-for-gestational age (SGA) at an earlier gestation of 30 + 0 to 34 + 0 weeks. Methods This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study of prospectively collected data on 3012 women with a singleton pregnancy undergoing ultrasound examination at 30 + 0 to 34 + 0 weeks' gestation as part of a universal screening program. We used the default FMF competing-risks model for prediction of SGA at 36 weeks' gestation combining maternal factors (age, obstetric and medical history, weight, height, smoking status, race, mode of conception), estimated fetal weight (EFW) and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) to calculate risks for different cut-offs of birth-weight percentile and gestational age at delivery. We examined the accuracy of the model by means of discrimination and calibration. Results The prediction of SGA < 3(rd) percentile improved with the addition of UtA-PI and with a shorter examination-to-delivery interval. For a 10% false-positive rate, maternal factors, EFW and UtA-PI predicted 88.0%, 74.4% and 72.8% of SGA < 3(rd) percentile delivered at < 37, < 40 and < 42 weeks' gestation, respectively. The respective values for SGA < 10(th) percentile were 86.1%, 69.3% and 66.2%. In terms of population stratification, if the biomarkers used are EFW and UtA-PI and the aim is to detect 90% of SGA < 10(th) percentile, then 10.8% of the population should be scanned within 2 weeks after the initial assessment, an additional 7.2% (total screen-positive rate (SPR), 18.0%) should be scanned within 2-4 weeks after the initial assessment and an additional 11.7% (total SPR, 29.7%) should be examined within 4-6 weeks after the initial assessment. The new model was well calibrated. Conclusions The 36-week FMF competing-risks model for SGA is also applicable and accurate at 30 + 0 to 34 + 0 weeks and provides effective risk stratification, especially for cases leading to delivery < 37 weeks of gestation. (c) 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 471
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation [J].
Akolekar, R. ;
Panaitescu, A. M. ;
Ciobanu, A. ;
Syngelaki, A. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (04) :484-491
[2]   External validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for midgestation prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates in Spanish population [J].
Albaiges, G. ;
Papastefanou, I. ;
Rodriguez, I. ;
Prats, P. ;
Echevarria, M. ;
Rodriguez, M. A. ;
Melcon, A. Rodriguez .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 (02) :202-208
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. Green-top Guideline No. 31
[4]   Diagnostic performance of third-trimester ultrasound for the prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Caradeux, Javier ;
Martinez-Portilla, Raigam J. ;
Peguero, Anna ;
Sotiriadis, Alexandros ;
Figueras, Francesc .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) :449-+
[5]   Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates [J].
Ciobanu, A. ;
Khan, N. ;
Syngelaki, A. ;
Akolekar, R. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (06) :761-768
[6]  
Ciobanu A., 2019, Am J Obstet Gynecol, V220, pe1
[7]   Mid-pregnancy fetal biometry, uterine artery Doppler indices and maternal demographic characteristics: role in prediction of small-for-gestational-age birth [J].
Familiari, Alessandra ;
Bhide, Amar ;
Morlando, Maddalena ;
Scala, Carolina ;
Khalil, Asma ;
Thilaganathan, Basky .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (02) :238-244
[8]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
SHARMAN, RS ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) :333-337
[9]   Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models [J].
Hammami, A. ;
Zumaeta, A. Mazer ;
Syngelaki, A. ;
Akolekar, R. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (01) :35-43
[10]   Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? [J].
Lindqvist, PG ;
Molin, J .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :258-264