Do no harm: the impact of implementing cancer prevention strategies on other preventive health measures

被引:0
|
作者
Emmons, Karen M. [1 ]
Pelton-Cairns, Leslie [2 ]
Gundersen, Daniel A. [1 ,3 ]
Cruz, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Mascioli, Lynette [2 ]
Kruse, Gina R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Massachusetts League Community Hlth Ctr, 40 Court St,10th Floor, Boston, MA 02108 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Harvard Med Sch, Div Gen Internal Med, 100 Cambridge St,16th floor, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Implementation; Cancer screening; Unintended consequences; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-024-00597-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Translational efforts to increase uptake of evidence-based practices typically look at those outcomes in isolation of their impact on other aspects of care delivery. If we are in fact to "do no harm", we must consider the possible negative impact of improving use of one practice on other quality measures. Alternatively, a focus on one practice could lead to spread of effective strategies to other practices, which would be highly beneficial. We studied the impact of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiative on delivery of other preventive care measures.Methods We used an interrupted time series design with implementation year as the interruption point. The initiative was conducted between 2015 and 2020, with three staggered cohorts. Main outcomes were quality measures for colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, hypertension management, diabetes management, weight screening and follow-up, tobacco use screening and cessation treatment, and depression screening and follow-up.Results The initiative was associated with an increase in CRC screening (OR = 1.67, p <= 0.01; average marginal effect = 12.2% points), and did not reduce performance on other quality measures in the year of CRC program implementation or a change in their respective secular trends.Conclusions The initiative led to a clinically meaningful increase in CRC screening and was not associated with reductions in delivery of six other preventive services. Quality improvement (QI) initiatives typically approach implementation with an eye towards reducing unintended impact and leveraging existing staff and resources. Implementation research studies may benefit from considering how QI initiatives factor in the local context in implementation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Cancer in global health: How do prevention and early detection strategies relate?
    Ilbawi, Andre M.
    Anderson, Benjamin O.
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 7 (278)
  • [2] Preventive health measures in small and medium-sized enterprises: A scoping review on implementation strategies
    Roben, Thomas
    van Oostrom, Sandra
    Benning, Friederike
    Smit, Denise
    Proper, Karin
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2024, 119
  • [3] Strategies for Disseminating and Implementing COVID-19 Public Health Prevention Practices in Rural Areas
    Prusaczyk, Beth
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2021, 37 (01) : 142 - 144
  • [4] Cancer beliefs and screening behaviors: The impact of neighborhood and other social determinants of health
    Layne, Tracy M.
    Agarwal, Parul
    Rapkin, Bruce D.
    Jandorf, Lina H.
    Bickell, Nina A.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [5] Leveraging Clinical Decision Support and Integrated Medical-Dental Electronic Health Records to Implementing Precision in Oral Cancer Risk Assessment and Preventive Intervention
    Rindal, Donald B.
    Mabry, Patricia L.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [6] Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?
    Kariya, Hitomi
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Lin, John
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Ko, Linda K.
    Winer, Rachel L.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 154
  • [7] Framing the Local Context and Estimating the Health Impact of CPPW Obesity Prevention Strategies in Los Angeles County, 2010-2012
    Kuo, Tony
    Robles, Brenda
    Trogdon, Justin G.
    Ferencik, Rachel
    Simon, Paul A.
    Fielding, Jonathan E.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (04) : 360 - 369
  • [8] The health and economic impact of scaling cervical cancer prevention in 50 low-and lower-middle-income countries
    Campos, Nicole G.
    Sharma, Monisha
    Clark, Andrew
    Lee, Kyueun
    Geng, Fangli
    Regan, Catherine
    Kim, Jane
    Resch, Stephen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 138 : 47 - 56
  • [9] A study protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial for comparing strategies for implementing primary HPV testing for routine cervical cancer screening in a large health care system
    Chao, Chun R.
    Cannizzaro, Nancy T.
    Hahn, Erin E.
    Tewari, Devansu
    Quyen Ngo-Metzger
    Hsu, Chunyi
    Shen, Ernest
    Wride, Patricia
    Hodeib, Melissa
    Gould, Michael
    Mittman, Brian S.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2023, 124
  • [10] Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers
    Carney, Timothy Jay
    Morgan, Geoffrey P.
    Jones, Josette
    McDaniel, Anna M.
    Weaver, Michael
    Weiner, Bryan
    Haggstrom, David A.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 51 : 200 - 209