Machine learning for groundwater levels: uncovering the best predictors

被引:0
|
作者
Abu Saleh, Md. [1 ]
Rasel, H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rajshahi Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Rajshahi 6204, Bangladesh
关键词
Groundwater sustainability; Forecasting; Machine learning; Regression; Bangladesh; NEURAL-NETWORK; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLUCTUATIONS; IRRIGATION; SIMULATION; REGRESSION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s40899-024-01146-8
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
When it comes to water for crops, groundwater reigns supreme. Its affordability and year-round availability make it a game-changer for a nation's economic engine. Geographically, the Barind tract suffers from drought in a historic manner due to the random fluctuation of groundwater levels. Thus, developing an accurate forecasting model plays a pivotal role in any kind of measure to be taken in the future. This study aimed to find the most accurate regression model to forecast the groundwater level from 2021 to 2030 using historical data from 1990 to 2020 by conducting a comparative analysis among Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) simulations. SVM regression came with more reliable accuracy metrics (MAE, MSE, RMSE, SMAPE, NSE, explaining variation, correlation, and Wilmott's Index of Agreement or d value). Compared to RF and GBM, SVM regression achieved better accuracy on the training data (1990-2010) with lower error terms (MAE, MSE, RMSE, SMAPE) and a higher correlation (77%) between predicted and actual values. SVM also explained a larger portion of the data variance (55%), suggesting it captured the key factors influencing groundwater levels, both in training and testing phase. The biasness of SVM regression was found to be closer to the zero-bias line, which indicated that the predicted values were less overfitted than the other models. Even a slow increase (0.003 m/year, as found in this study) in depth can lead to significant depletion over several decades, potentially impacting water availability in the long run. The analysis of future groundwater depth (2021-2030) predicts a relatively stable scenario with an average fluctuation of around 4.9 m from the ground surface. This stability comes after a period of increased fluctuation that began around 2024. Interestingly, the overall trend suggests a rising groundwater depth. This rise is expected to start with a potentially rapid initial increase, followed by a more gradual rise after 2028. Furthermore, collaboration between researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders in the water and agriculture sectors can help ensure that the forecasting models are effectively utilized to support sustainable water management practices in Bangladesh to achieve target 4.07f, which states strengthening groundwater monitoring under the National Water Management Plan (NWMP).
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Uncovering cancer vulnerabilities by machine learning prediction of synthetic lethality
    Salvatore Benfatto
    Özdemirhan Serçin
    Francesca R. Dejure
    Amir Abdollahi
    Frank T. Zenke
    Balca R. Mardin
    Molecular Cancer, 20
  • [32] Uncovering Social Spammers: Social Honeypots plus Machine Learning
    Lee, Kyumin
    Caverlee, James
    Webb, Steve
    SIGIR 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2010, : 435 - 442
  • [33] Comparison of Three Machine Learning Approaches to Examine the Genetic and Environmental Predictors of Vitamin D Levels
    Engelman, Corinne D.
    Lo, Justin
    O'Brien, Martha
    Langefeld, Carl D.
    Fingerlin, Tasha E.
    Norris, Jill M.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 (08) : 774 - 774
  • [34] Machine learning in multi-omics data to assess longitudinal predictors of glycaemic trait levels
    Kaakinen, Marika
    Prelot, Laurie
    Draisma, Harmen
    Anasanti, Mila D.
    Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
    Prokopenko, Inga
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 42 (07) : 709 - 709
  • [35] Uncovering Synergy and Dysergy in Consumer Reviews: A Machine Learning Approach
    Zhang, Zelin
    Yang, Kejia
    Zhang, Jonathan Z.
    Palmatier, Robert W.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (04) : 2339 - 2360
  • [36] Identification of the Best Anthropometric Predictors of Serum High- and Low-Density Lipoproteins Using Machine Learning
    Lee, Bum Ju
    Kim, Jong Yeol
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2015, 19 (05) : 1747 - 1756
  • [37] Machine Learning in CNC Machining: Best Practices
    von Hahn, Tim
    Mechefske, Chris K.
    MACHINES, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [38] Stereoisomers Are Not Machine Learning's Best Friends
    Tahil, Gokhan
    Delorme, Fabien
    Le Berre, Daniel
    Monflier, Eric
    Sayede, Adlane
    Tilloy, Sebastien
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2024, 64 (14) : 5451 - 5469
  • [39] Best practices in machine learning for chemistry comment
    Artrith, Nongnuch
    Butler, Keith T.
    Coudert, Francois-Xavier
    Han, Seungwu
    Isayev, Olexandr
    Jain, Anubhav
    Walsh, Aron
    NATURE CHEMISTRY, 2021, 13 (06) : 505 - 508
  • [40] Is Machine Learning the Best Option for Network Routing?
    Tang, Liou
    Krishnamurthy, Prashant
    Abdelhakim, Mai
    ICC 2024 - IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, : 5425 - 5430