National scale biodiversity conservation priorities based on integrated multiple vulnerability features in China

被引:1
|
作者
Du, Zhibo [1 ]
Li, Longqin [1 ]
Liang, Jiaan [1 ]
Kang, Binyue [1 ]
Meng, Weiqing [2 ]
Li, Hongyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Climate change; Collaborative governance; Vulnerability characterization; Spatial conservation prioritization framework; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LIVESTOCK BALANCE; ECOSYSTEM; CARBON; PLATEAU; DATASET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111914
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
To meet the ambitious goals of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, China's spatial implementation plan, which will delineate which areas will be protected, requires clarity at the national level. Prioritizing biodiversity alone, especially when a single species' richness is emphasized, may lead to inadequate conservation strategies, thus making it challenging to meet the requirements of collaborative governance. Here, we provide a spatial conservation prioritization method integrating species, carbon, climate, and anthropogenic vulnerability features. As such, we identified land to prioritize in conservation efforts by constructing different conservation scenarios with different combinations of vulnerability features using Chinese terrestrial ecosystems as an example. We also analyzed the differences in the benefits of different conservation scenarios. The results showed spatial variability in the distribution of land prioritized by the various protection scenarios. The conservation scenario that combined all features best harmonized the benefits and thus avoided an imbalance in conservation caused by an undue focus on one feature. The scenarios covered 73.54% of biodiversity hotspots, 63.17% of vulnerable carbon hotspots, and 80.21% of climate hotspots. We also found that forests had a strong presence in the various configurations of prioritized land, and usually exceeded 50% of the prioritized area. Secondly, cropland accounted for a prominent proportion of prioritized land at approximately 29.72%, and ranked second only to forests. In addition, when accounting for carbon vulnerability as well, the proportion of grasslands in the prioritized land increased by about 3.35 times. This study offers valuable and citable information that may be used to support biodiversity conservation initiatives in China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] National scale assessment of the soil erosion and conservation function of terraces in China
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Xin, Liangjie
    Lu, Yahan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [32] Achieving ecological conservation impact is not enough: setting priorities based on multiple criteria
    Nuno, A.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 18 (01) : 16 - 17
  • [33] Conservation of Aquatic Biodiversity in the Context of Multiple-Use Management on National Forest System Lands
    Roper, Brett B.
    Capurso, James M.
    Paroz, Yvette
    Young, Michael K.
    FISHERIES, 2018, 43 (09) : 396 - 405
  • [34] Bringing conservation priorities into urban growth simulation: An integrated model and applied case study of Hangzhou, China
    Li, Yonghua
    Ma, Qiwei
    Song, Yan
    Han, Haoying
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 140 : 324 - 337
  • [35] Scale effects of supplementary nature reserves on biodiversity conservation in China's southern hilly region
    Tang, Zhiying
    Tian, Huimin
    Wang, Yuerong
    Zhang, Jian
    Li, Wenting
    Wang, Tianxiang
    Cheng, Jin
    Su, Chunmei
    Qi, Lianghua
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 373
  • [36] Landscape-scale giant panda conservation based on metapopulations within China's national park system
    Xu, Yu
    Yang, Biao
    Dai, Qiang
    Pan, Han
    Zhong, Xue
    Ran, Jianghong
    Yang, Xuyu
    Gu, Xiaodong
    Yang, Zhisong
    Qi, Dunwu
    Hou, Rong
    Zhang, Zejun
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (30)
  • [37] Youth wildlife preferences and species-based conservation priorities in a low-income biodiversity hotspot region
    Liles, Michael J.
    Peterson, M. Nils
    Stevenson, Kathryn T.
    Peterson, Markus J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 48 (02) : 110 - 117
  • [38] Designating conservation priorities for Southeast European hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on species distribution models and species vulnerability
    Milicic, Marija
    Vujic, Ante
    Jurca, Tamara
    Cardoso, Pedro
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2017, 10 (04) : 354 - 366
  • [39] INTEGRATED IT TOOLS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS. CASE STUDY: BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN JIU VALLEY NATIONAL PARK
    Lorint, Csaba
    Lupu-Dima, Lucian
    Edelhauser, Eduard
    Lorint, Alina
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 13 (06): : 1393 - 1399
  • [40] Impacts of dam on Key Biodiversity Area in southwest China based on integrated map
    Chong, L.
    Jing, P.
    Hao, W.
    DAMS AND RESERVOIRS UNDER CHANGING CHALLENGES, 2011, : 843 - 848