National scale biodiversity conservation priorities based on integrated multiple vulnerability features in China

被引:1
|
作者
Du, Zhibo [1 ]
Li, Longqin [1 ]
Liang, Jiaan [1 ]
Kang, Binyue [1 ]
Meng, Weiqing [2 ]
Li, Hongyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biodiversity conservation; Climate change; Collaborative governance; Vulnerability characterization; Spatial conservation prioritization framework; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LIVESTOCK BALANCE; ECOSYSTEM; CARBON; PLATEAU; DATASET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111914
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
To meet the ambitious goals of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, China's spatial implementation plan, which will delineate which areas will be protected, requires clarity at the national level. Prioritizing biodiversity alone, especially when a single species' richness is emphasized, may lead to inadequate conservation strategies, thus making it challenging to meet the requirements of collaborative governance. Here, we provide a spatial conservation prioritization method integrating species, carbon, climate, and anthropogenic vulnerability features. As such, we identified land to prioritize in conservation efforts by constructing different conservation scenarios with different combinations of vulnerability features using Chinese terrestrial ecosystems as an example. We also analyzed the differences in the benefits of different conservation scenarios. The results showed spatial variability in the distribution of land prioritized by the various protection scenarios. The conservation scenario that combined all features best harmonized the benefits and thus avoided an imbalance in conservation caused by an undue focus on one feature. The scenarios covered 73.54% of biodiversity hotspots, 63.17% of vulnerable carbon hotspots, and 80.21% of climate hotspots. We also found that forests had a strong presence in the various configurations of prioritized land, and usually exceeded 50% of the prioritized area. Secondly, cropland accounted for a prominent proportion of prioritized land at approximately 29.72%, and ranked second only to forests. In addition, when accounting for carbon vulnerability as well, the proportion of grasslands in the prioritized land increased by about 3.35 times. This study offers valuable and citable information that may be used to support biodiversity conservation initiatives in China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Securing a future for China's plant biodiversity through an integrated conservation approach
    Sergei Volis
    Plant Diversity, 2018, 40 (03) : 91 - 105
  • [22] How to Conserve the Biodiversity on Collective Land in National Park: Conservation Easements in China
    Que, Zhanwen
    Islam, Md. Ziaul
    LAND, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [23] Mapping Biodiversity Conservation Priorities for Protected Areas for Spatial Optimization: A Case Study in the Songnen Plain, China
    Sun, Qiaoyun
    Yu, Jianqi
    Zeng, Yingran
    Gai, Yifang
    Wang, Jia
    Zhang, Yujun
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [24] Identifying transboundary conservation priorities in a biodiversity hotspot of China and Myanmar: Implications for data poor mountainous regions
    Yang, Yin
    Ren, Guopeng
    Li, Wenjuan
    Huang, Zhipang
    Lin, Aung Ko
    Garber, Paul A.
    Ma, Chi
    Yi, Shaoliang
    Momberg, Frank
    Gao, Ying
    Wang, Xinwen
    Li, Guangsong
    Behie, Alison
    Xiao, Wen
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 20
  • [25] A national-scale model of linear features improves predictions of farmland biodiversity
    Sullivan, Martin J. P.
    Pearce-Higgins, James W.
    Newson, Stuart E.
    Scholefield, Paul
    Brereton, Tom
    Oliver, Tom H.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (06) : 1776 - 1784
  • [26] Identifying restoration priorities for wetlands based on historical distributions of biodiversity features and restoration suitability
    Qu, Yi
    Sun, Gongqi
    Luo, Chunyu
    Zeng, Xingyu
    Zhang, Hongqiang
    Murray, Nicholas J.
    Xu, Nan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 231 : 1222 - 1231
  • [27] Threats to, and conservation of, biodiversity in the Siling Co National Nature Reserve, Tibetan Plateau, China
    Wang, Baoqiang
    Chen, Kang
    Zhu, Ren
    ECO MONT-JOURNAL ON PROTECTED MOUNTAIN AREAS RESEARCH, 2024, 16 (02): : 47 - 52
  • [28] Marine biodiversity conservation based on integrated coastal zone management (ICZM)-A case study in Quanzhou Bay, Fujian, China
    Chen Bin
    Huang Hao
    Yu Weiwei
    Zheng Senlin
    Wang Jinkeng
    Jiang Jinlong
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 52 (12) : 612 - 619
  • [29] Cost-effective integrated conservation and restoration priorities by trading off multiple ecosystem services
    Mu, Yonglin
    Guo, Yun
    Li, Xiaowen
    Li, Peng
    Bai, Junhong
    Linke, Simon
    Cui, Baoshan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 320
  • [30] ASSESSING THE ECOSYSTEM VULNERABILITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN PU MAT NATIONAL PARK, NGHEAN PROVINCE, VIETNAM
    Hong, N., V
    Nhat, V. H.
    Cam, L., V
    Thanh, N.
    Quy, K., V
    Nhung, T. T.
    Thao, N. P.
    Hien, N. T. T.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 22 (01): : 587 - 607