PICRAT Analysis of Technology-Integration Activities in U.S. K-12 Public Schools

被引:0
作者
Sung, Woonhee [1 ]
An, Heejung [2 ]
Thomas, Christopher L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Tyler, Sch Educ, 3900 Univ Blvd, Tyler, TX 75799 USA
[2] William Paterson Univ New Jersey, Coll Educ, Wayne, NJ USA
关键词
Online teaching; PICRAT; technology-integration matrix; levels of technology integration; teacher support; quality evaluation; USER ACCEPTANCE; TEACH ONLINE; BELIEFS; CLASSROOMS; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/07380569.2024.2338243
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined technology integration in K-12 public schools based on the PICRAT (Passive, Interactive, Creative, Replace, Amplify, Transformative) matrix classification. Seventy-six K-12 teachers voluntarily completed an online survey between December 2020 and February 2021 that asked about their (a) grade-level teaching (b) implementation frequency of various technology-integrated activities, and (c) support. Results showed that teachers' real-class implementation of technology-integrated activities and the PICRAT levels of integration differed significantly between K-6 vs. 7-12 grades. More frequent use of overall technology-integrated activities was found in grades 7-12 than in K-6. Further, an analysis based on the PICRAT matrix found higher frequencies for Passive and Replace levels and lower frequencies for Creative and Transformative use for all grades. Finally, teacher support significantly predicted overall technology-integration frequencies for both K-6 and 7-12 grades. With regard to prediction on each level of PICRAT classification, support in K-6 grades was significantly related to all levels of technology integration except for Passive. However, in 7-12 grade, support failed to predict the frequency of technology integration for all levels except Amplify. Future directions are discussed, including the role of professional development and the importance of technology-integration frameworks in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Adnan M, 2020, Online Submission, V2, P45, DOI [DOI 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309, 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309]
[2]  
Aldosemani T., 2019, TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, V18, P46
[3]  
An H., 2022, Journal of Online Learning Research, V8, P203
[4]   Implementation of learning by design in a synchronized online environment to teach educational robotics to inservice teachers [J].
An, Heejung ;
Sung, Woonhee ;
Yoon, So Yoon .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 70 (04) :1473-1496
[5]   Hands-on, Minds-on, Hearts-on, Social-on: A Collaborative Maker Project Integrating Arts in a Synchronous Online Environment for Teachers [J].
An, Heejung ;
Sung, Woonhee ;
Yoon, So Yoon .
TECHTRENDS, 2022, 66 (04) :590-606
[6]   Examining K-12 teachers' feelings, experiences, and perspectives regarding online teaching during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
An, Yunjo ;
Kaplan-Rakowski, Regina ;
Yang, Junhe ;
Conan, Jenna ;
Kinard, Widad ;
Daughrity, LeaAnne .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 69 (05) :2589-2613
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ISTE Standards for Educators
[8]  
Aslan S, 2022, ONLINE LEARN, V26, P52
[9]  
Barbour MK, 2013, TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND ONLINE LEARNING TOOLS: INNOVATIONS IN TEACHER PREPARATION, P60, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-1906-7.ch004
[10]  
Barron A. E., 2003, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, V35, P489