DEVELOPMENT OF RETAIL BANKING SERVICES IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

被引:0
作者
Mamadiyarov, Zokir [1 ]
Hakimov, Hakimjon [2 ]
Askarov, Sarvar [3 ]
机构
[1] Tashkent State Univ Econ, Dept Financial Market & Insurence, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
[2] Tashkent State Univ Econ, Fac Distance Educ, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
[3] Tashkent State Univ Econ, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
来源
FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE | 2024年 / 1卷 / 54期
关键词
retail banking services; FinTech; banking products; mobile banking; plastic card; deposit; bank loans; MODEL;
D O I
10.55643/fcaptp.1.54.2024.4288
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The article examines retail banking services, their importance and how they are improving in the context of digital transformation. In the article, using the data of 14 commercial banks in Uzbekistan, the number of observations is 280. The dependent variable is the deposit practice of commercial banks, the independent variables are the credit practice of commercial banks, the remote services of commercial banks and the practice of commercial banks with plastic cards, analyzed through several models. The research shows that when we analyze 3 models based on panel data, the Random effects estimator (REE) model econometric equation of the impact of retail banking services development practices in the national economy today is Y=0.59x1+0.08x2+0.22x3-1.66 is the most optimal model. Accordingly, regarding the choice between the Fixed effects estimator (FEE) model and the Random effects estimator (REE) model, the Hausman test is used to determine which model is more suitable. The test compares the estimates from two models and tests whether the difference between them is statistically significant. If the p-value of the test is greater than the significance level (usually 0.05), then the Random effects estimator (REE) model is preferred because it allows for unobserved heterogeneity not accounted for in the Fixed effects estimator (FEE) model. In this case, the p-value of the Hausman test is equal to 0.36, which is greater than 0.05. We use the Random effects estimator (REE) model to analyze the impact of the practice of developing retail banking services in the national economy today based on panel data. We came to the conclusion that it is suitable.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 67
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A model of liquidity hoarding and term premia in inter-bank markets [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Skeie, David .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2011, 58 (05) :436-447
[2]   Factors influencing individuals' intention to adopt mobile banking in China and Pakistan: The moderating role of cultural values [J].
Akhtar, Sadia ;
Irfan, Muhammad ;
Sarwar, Asma ;
Asma ;
Rashid, Qurat Ul Ain .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2019, 19 (01)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, World Retail Banking Report
[4]   The two-way Hausman and Taylor estimator [J].
Baltagi, Badi H. .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 228
[5]  
Berger A.N., 1992, ANTITRUST BULL, V37, P541
[6]   Change point estimation in panel data with time-varying individual effects [J].
Boldea, Otilia ;
Drepper, Bettina ;
Gan, Zhuojiong .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2020, 35 (06) :712-727
[7]  
Daniel E., 1999, INT J BANKING MARKET, V17, P72, DOI DOI 10.1108/02652329910258934
[8]   Factors affecting satisfaction and intention to repurchase retail banking services in Vietnam [J].
Dao Cam Thuy ;
Nguyen Ngoc Quang .
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (01)
[9]  
Demirguc-Kunt A., 2000, BANK CONCENTRATION C
[10]  
European Central Bank Statistical data warehouse, 2022, Average cost-to-income ratio for banks in the European Union from 4th quarter 2007 to 4th quarter 2022