Nonoperative versus operative management of type II odontoid fracture in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Avila, Mauricio J. [1 ]
Farber, S. Harrison [2 ]
Rabah, Nicholas M. [2 ]
Hopp, Morgan J. [2 ]
Chapple, Kristina M. [2 ]
Hurlbert, R. John [1 ]
Tumialan, Luis M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Neurosurg, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Barrow Neurol Inst, Dept Neurosurg, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
cervical collar; elderly; geriatric; odontoid fracture; spine fusion; systematic review; treatment; ANTERIOR SCREW FIXATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; GERIATRIC POPULATION; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; EARLY COMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; CERVICAL COLLAR; DENS FRACTURES; TERM OUTCOMES; MORTALITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Odontoid fractures are the most common fracture of the cervical spine in adults older than 65 years of age. Fracture management remains controversial, given the inherently increased surgical risks in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare fusion rates and outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatments of type II odontoid fractures in the older population. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting the management of type II odontoid fractures in patients older than 65 years from database inception to September 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to compare rates of fusion, stable and unstable nonunion, mortality, and complication. RESULTS Forty-six articles were included in the final review. There were 2822 patients included in the different studies (48.9% female, 51.1% male), with a mean +/- SD age of 81.5 +/- 3.6 years. Patients in the operative group were significantly younger than patients in the nonoperative group (81.5 +/- 3.5 vs 83.4 +/- 2.5 years, p < 0.001). The overall (operative and nonoperative patients) fusion rate was 52.9% (720/1361). The fusion rate was higher in patients who underwent surgery (74.3%) than in those who underwent nonoperative management (40.3%) (OR 4.27, 95% CI 3.36-5.44). The likelihood of stable or unstable nonunion was lower in patients who underwent surgery (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28-0.49 vs OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.22-0.47). Overall, 4.8% (46/964) of nonoperatively managed patients subsequently required surgery due to treatment failure. Patient mortality across all studies was 16.6% (452/2721), lower in the operative cohort (13.2%) than the nonoperative cohort (19.0%) (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.80). Complications were more likely in patients who underwent surgery (26.0% vs 18.5%) (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95). Length of stay was also higher with surgery (13.6 +/- 3.8 vs 8.1 +/- 1.9 days, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients older than 65 years of age with type II odontoid fractures had higher fusion rates when treated with surgery and higher stable nonunion rates when managed nonoperatively. Complications and length of stay were higher in the surgical cohort. Mortality rates were lower in patients managed with surgery, but this phenomenon could be related to surgical selection bias. Fewer than 5% of patients who underwent nonoperative treatment required revision surgery due to treatment failure, suggesting that stable nonunion is an acceptable treatment goal.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 53
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Operative Versus Nonoperative Outcomes of Middle-Third Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Amer, Kamil
    Smith, Brendan
    Thomson, Jennifer E.
    Congiusta, Dominick
    Reilly, Mark C.
    Sirkin, Michael S.
    Adams, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2020, 34 (01) : E6 - E13
  • [22] Multimorbidity and mortality in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nunes, Bruno Pereira
    Flores, Thayna Ramos
    Mielke, Gregore Iven
    Thume, Elaine
    Facchini, Luiz Augusto
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2016, 67 : 130 - 138
  • [23] Prognosis of nonoperative treatment in elderly patients with a hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Loggers, Sverre A., I
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    Joosse, Pieter
    Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
    Willems, Hanna C.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (11): : 2407 - 2413
  • [24] Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Looney, Austin M.
    Day, Jonathan
    Bodendorfer, Blake M.
    Wang, David
    Fryar, Caroline M.
    Murphy, Jordan P.
    Chang, Edward S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (04) : E169 - E189
  • [25] Management of atrial fibrillation for older people with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Todd, Oliver
    Clegg, Andrew
    Gale, Chris P.
    Hall, Marlous
    AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48 (02) : 196 - 204
  • [26] Conservative versus surgical treatment for type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: Grading the evidence through a meta-analysis
    Yang, Z.
    Yuan, Z-Z
    Ma, J-X
    Ma, X-L
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (07) : 839 - 844
  • [27] Cost Effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatment of Geriatric Type-II Odontoid Fracture
    Barlow, Daniel R.
    Higgins, Brendan T.
    Ozanne, Elissa M.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Pearson, Adam M.
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (07) : 610 - 617
  • [28] Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review
    Rehn C.-H.
    Kirkegaard M.
    Viberg B.
    Larsen M.S.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (7) : 1047 - 1053
  • [29] Nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plate fixation for elderly patients with distal radial fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qiang
    Ke, Chao
    Han, Shuang
    Xu, Xin
    Cong, Yu-Xuan
    Shang, Kun
    Liang, Ji-Dong
    Zhang, Bin-Fei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [30] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Health Literacy in Iranian Older Adults
    Mirmohammadkhani, Majid
    Ziari, Abbas
    Momeni, Marjan
    SALMAND-IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2020, 15 (01): : 2 - 13